BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ SUZUKI/TL1000R
Model report · 2005–2025

SUZUKI TL1000R

996cc Petrol Class 2
79.6%
first-time pass rate
12.9%
failed outright
20,344
median miles at test
17.0k
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2025

The TL1000R's first-time pass rate has risen 5.5 points since 2005, 79.4% to 84.9%.

73%82%90%2005: 79.4% pass (209 tests)2006: 83.5% pass (1,505 tests)2007: 80.3% pass (1,381 tests)2008: 77.8% pass (1,351 tests)2009: 78.0% pass (1,279 tests)2010: 76.7% pass (1,247 tests)2011: 76.5% pass (1,151 tests)2012: 75.6% pass (1,019 tests)2013: 77.6% pass (967 tests)2014: 78.7% pass (897 tests)2015: 77.0% pass (877 tests)2016: 79.0% pass (818 tests)2017: 82.2% pass (697 tests)2018: 82.6% pass (536 tests)2019: 76.9% pass (489 tests)2020: 81.1% pass (403 tests)2021: 80.7% pass (535 tests)2022: 85.6% pass (494 tests)2023: 86.5% pass (444 tests)2024: 87.5% pass (321 tests)2025: 84.9% pass (352 tests)20052025

Pass rate by mileage

how the TL1000R's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage TL1000R passes first time 84.9% of the time; by 50k that's 71.3%.

69%78%88%0k: 84.9% pass (2,028 tests)10k: 82.0% pass (6,203 tests)20k: 77.6% pass (5,161 tests)30k: 76.1% pass (2,396 tests)40k: 74.6% pass (769 tests)50k: 71.3% pass (258 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a TL1000R

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
1,509 31.5 1.4×
brakes
998 20.8 1.0×
steering and suspension
637 13.3 1.0×
tyres and wheels
442 9.2 1.2×
reg plates and vin
311 6.5 2.4×
lamps and reflectors
300 6.3 0.7×
fuel and exhaust
278 5.8 1.9×
drive system
157 3.3 1.1×
suspension
92 1.9 0.6×
body and structure
68 1.4 0.8×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the TL1000R beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (BMW R1200, BMW R1150, TRIUMPH SPRINT).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the TL1000R.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2003 (85.1% pass). Weakest: 1997 (74.5%).

72%80%87%1997: 74.5% pass (55 tests)1998: 78.1% pass (4,468 tests)1999: 78.8% pass (5,750 tests)2000: 79.8% pass (4,244 tests)2001: 82.2% pass (1,010 tests)2002: 83.7% pass (730 tests)2003: 85.1% pass (692 tests)199720002003

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

SUZUKI TL1000R FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the SUZUKI TL1000R reliable?

The SUZUKI TL1000R is less reliable than average for its class: 79.6% of its 16,972 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3666 of 5426 models.

What does a TL1000R fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 31% of all defects recorded against failed TL1000R tests.

What is the best year of TL1000R to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2003-registered examples do best (85.1%) and 1997 worst (74.5%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a TL1000R last?

The median TL1000R shows 20,344 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 71.3% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.