BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

SUZUKI RGV250

249cc Petrol Class 2
82.3%
first-time pass rate
9.9%
failed outright
16,613
median miles at test
6,513
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2025

The RGV250's first-time pass rate has risen 25.2 points since 2005, 68.2% to 93.4%.

62%81%100%2005: 68.2% pass (110 tests)2006: 75.9% pass (551 tests)2007: 70.9% pass (457 tests)2008: 75.0% pass (416 tests)2009: 81.3% pass (384 tests)2010: 76.5% pass (370 tests)2011: 79.9% pass (368 tests)2012: 77.8% pass (324 tests)2013: 80.3% pass (335 tests)2014: 83.7% pass (313 tests)2015: 81.9% pass (288 tests)2016: 84.3% pass (280 tests)2017: 87.1% pass (278 tests)2018: 88.9% pass (235 tests)2019: 90.5% pass (241 tests)2020: 91.0% pass (188 tests)2021: 88.4% pass (303 tests)2022: 92.2% pass (306 tests)2023: 90.6% pass (297 tests)2024: 89.8% pass (225 tests)2025: 93.4% pass (244 tests)20052025

Pass rate by mileage

how the RGV250's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage RGV250 passes first time 84.3% of the time; by 50k that's 86.7%.

77%83%88%0k: 84.3% pass (1,239 tests)10k: 83.3% pass (3,070 tests)20k: 78.9% pass (1,634 tests)30k: 80.6% pass (355 tests)40k: 83.0% pass (94 tests)50k: 86.7% pass (30 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a RGV250

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
572 34.6 1.2×
brakes
399 24.1 1.0×
steering and suspension
253 15.3 1.0×
tyres and wheels
115 7 0.7×
body and structure
85 5.1 2.1×
reg plates and vin
74 4.5 1.7×
drive system
63 3.8 1.1×
lamps and reflectors
35 2.1 0.3×
fuel and exhaust
33 2 0.6×
structure and attachments
25 1.5 0.5×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the RGV250 beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YP250, YAMAHA WR250F, HONDA XR250).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the RGV250.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1997 (85.1% pass). Weakest: 1988 (75.6%).

74%80%87%1971: 76.5% pass (51 tests)1988: 75.6% pass (135 tests)1989: 78.7% pass (597 tests)1990: 81.4% pass (598 tests)1991: 83.2% pass (1,053 tests)1992: 83.0% pass (1,155 tests)1993: 81.7% pass (882 tests)1994: 83.2% pass (816 tests)1995: 83.0% pass (411 tests)1996: 83.3% pass (468 tests)1997: 85.1% pass (134 tests)197119921997

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

SUZUKI RGV250 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the SUZUKI RGV250 reliable?

The SUZUKI RGV250 is less reliable than average for its class: 82.3% of its 6,513 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3130 of 5426 models.

What does a RGV250 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 35% of all defects recorded against failed RGV250 tests.

What is the best year of RGV250 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1997-registered examples do best (85.1%) and 1988 worst (75.6%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a RGV250 last?

The median RGV250 shows 16,613 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 86.7% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.