BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

SUZUKI RGV

249cc Petrol Class 2
81.8%
first-time pass rate
11.0%
failed outright
15,707
median miles at test
801
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2017

The RGV's first-time pass rate has risen 15.6 points since 2006, 75.0% to 90.6%.

64%80%96%2006: 75.0% pass (68 tests)2007: 74.5% pass (51 tests)2008: 71.2% pass (59 tests)2009: 84.4% pass (45 tests)2010: 78.3% pass (46 tests)2011: 76.9% pass (52 tests)2012: 69.6% pass (46 tests)2013: 75.0% pass (56 tests)2014: 86.2% pass (58 tests)2015: 86.4% pass (44 tests)2016: 90.0% pass (40 tests)2017: 90.6% pass (32 tests)20062017

Pass rate by mileage

how the RGV's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage RGV passes first time 87.0% of the time; by 30k that's 81.3%.

76%82%89%0k: 87.0% pass (161 tests)10k: 82.1% pass (385 tests)20k: 77.7% pass (175 tests)30k: 81.3% pass (48 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a RGV

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
70 32.6 1.3×
brakes
57 26.5 1.1×
steering and suspension
35 16.3 1.1×
reg plates and vin
15 7 2.8×
body and structure
10 4.7 2.3×
tyres and wheels
9 4.2 0.6×
lamps and reflectors
6 2.8 0.4×
drive system
6 2.8 0.9×
Identification of the vehicle
4 1.9 2.2×
suspension
3 1.4 0.5×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the RGV beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YP250, YAMAHA WR250F, HONDA XR250).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the RGV.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1993 (88.3% pass). Weakest: 1996 (75.7%).

73%82%91%1989: 82.0% pass (50 tests)1990: 77.2% pass (79 tests)1991: 82.1% pass (117 tests)1992: 80.5% pass (149 tests)1993: 88.3% pass (103 tests)1994: 83.5% pass (97 tests)1995: 79.3% pass (58 tests)1996: 75.7% pass (70 tests)198919931996

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

SUZUKI RGV FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the SUZUKI RGV reliable?

The SUZUKI RGV is less reliable than average for its class: 81.8% of its 801 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3219 of 5426 models.

What does a RGV fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 33% of all defects recorded against failed RGV tests.

What is the best year of RGV to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1993-registered examples do best (88.3%) and 1996 worst (75.7%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a RGV last?

The median RGV shows 15,707 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 81.3% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.