BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

SUZUKI RF900R

937cc Petrol Class 2
78.9%
first-time pass rate
13.3%
failed outright
26,651
median miles at test
10.1k
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2025

The RF900R's first-time pass rate has risen 2.9 points since 2005, 80.3% to 83.2%.

74%81%87%2005: 80.3% pass (157 tests)2006: 84.3% pass (949 tests)2007: 77.7% pass (864 tests)2008: 77.5% pass (797 tests)2009: 76.9% pass (748 tests)2010: 76.7% pass (705 tests)2011: 77.2% pass (693 tests)2012: 76.6% pass (610 tests)2013: 78.0% pass (604 tests)2014: 80.7% pass (538 tests)2015: 78.0% pass (510 tests)2016: 80.5% pass (476 tests)2017: 79.5% pass (435 tests)2018: 77.2% pass (307 tests)2019: 78.2% pass (312 tests)2020: 76.3% pass (228 tests)2021: 80.6% pass (324 tests)2022: 78.6% pass (294 tests)2023: 82.1% pass (251 tests)2024: 84.8% pass (165 tests)2025: 83.2% pass (179 tests)20052025

Pass rate by mileage

how the RF900R's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage RF900R passes first time 88.3% of the time; by 50k that's 74.9%.

72%82%91%0k: 88.3% pass (692 tests)10k: 82.7% pass (2,430 tests)20k: 78.4% pass (2,969 tests)30k: 76.0% pass (2,171 tests)40k: 74.8% pass (1,111 tests)50k: 74.9% pass (454 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a RF900R

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
brakes
752 27 1.3×
lighting and signalling
664 23.9 1.2×
steering and suspension
569 20.5 1.4×
tyres and wheels
283 10.2 1.2×
lamps and reflectors
169 6.1 0.7×
drive system
123 4.4 1.3×
tyres
60 2.2 0.7×
suspension
59 2.1 0.7×
fuel and exhaust
54 1.9 0.7×
structure and attachments
48 1.7 0.6×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the RF900R beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (BMW R1200, BMW R1150, TRIUMPH SPRINT).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the RF900R.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2000 (85.9% pass). Weakest: 1994 (76.3%).

74%81%88%1994: 76.3% pass (1,890 tests)1995: 79.0% pass (1,821 tests)1996: 77.9% pass (1,734 tests)1997: 80.1% pass (1,717 tests)1998: 76.6% pass (991 tests)1999: 82.0% pass (1,704 tests)2000: 85.9% pass (199 tests)199419972000

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

SUZUKI RF900R FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the SUZUKI RF900R reliable?

The SUZUKI RF900R is less reliable than average for its class: 78.9% of its 10,146 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3787 of 5426 models.

What does a RF900R fail its MOT on most?

brakes — 27% of all defects recorded against failed RF900R tests.

What is the best year of RF900R to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2000-registered examples do best (85.9%) and 1994 worst (76.3%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a RF900R last?

The median RF900R shows 26,651 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 74.9% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.