BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ SUZUKI/BURGMAN
Model report · 2005–2025
81.7%
first-time pass rate
13.1%
failed outright
16,096
median miles at test
808
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2010–2023

The BURGMAN's first-time pass rate has fallen 14.0 points since 2010, 91.4% to 77.4%.

59%79%98%2010: 91.4% pass (35 tests)2011: 83.0% pass (47 tests)2012: 82.1% pass (56 tests)2013: 81.4% pass (70 tests)2014: 81.7% pass (71 tests)2015: 81.1% pass (74 tests)2016: 85.0% pass (60 tests)2017: 85.5% pass (55 tests)2018: 75.0% pass (40 tests)2019: 79.5% pass (39 tests)2020: 65.6% pass (32 tests)2021: 78.6% pass (42 tests)2022: 76.3% pass (38 tests)2023: 77.4% pass (31 tests)20102023

Pass rate by mileage

how the BURGMAN's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage BURGMAN passes first time 88.8% of the time; by 40k that's 81.3%.

70%81%92%0k: 88.8% pass (233 tests)10k: 83.2% pass (256 tests)20k: 74.7% pass (174 tests)30k: 73.4% pass (94 tests)40k: 81.3% pass (32 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a BURGMAN

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
brakes
67 34.4 1.5×
lighting and signalling
30 15.4 0.6×
tyres and wheels
26 13.3 1.4×
lamps and reflectors
20 10.3 1.2×
steering and suspension
18 9.2 0.6×
tyres
13 6.7 1.8×
fuel and exhaust
6 3.1 0.7×
steering
6 3.1 1.2×
suspension
5 2.6 0.8×
structure and attachments
4 2.1 0.5×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the BURGMAN beats 0 of its 2 closest rivals (HONDA Forza 300/350, PIAGGIO VESPA GTS 300 SUPER).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the BURGMAN.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2010 (86.7% pass). Weakest: 2003 (75.4%).

73%81%89%2000: 84.4% pass (77 tests)2003: 75.4% pass (61 tests)2006: 79.3% pass (58 tests)2007: 78.3% pass (92 tests)2008: 85.7% pass (119 tests)2009: 81.6% pass (141 tests)2010: 86.7% pass (83 tests)200020072010

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

SUZUKI BURGMAN FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the SUZUKI BURGMAN reliable?

The SUZUKI BURGMAN is less reliable than average for its class: 81.7% of its 808 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3242 of 5426 models.

What does a BURGMAN fail its MOT on most?

brakes — 34% of all defects recorded against failed BURGMAN tests.

What is the best year of BURGMAN to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2010-registered examples do best (86.7%) and 2003 worst (75.4%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a BURGMAN last?

The median BURGMAN shows 16,096 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 81.3% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.