Pass rate over time
The RS2 50's first-time pass rate has risen 2.2 points since 2007, 47.8% to 50.0%.
What fails on a RS2 50
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects | vs all bikes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lighting and signalling |
|
340 | 33.8 | 6.2× |
| steering and suspension |
|
270 | 26.8 | 8.1× |
| brakes |
|
151 | 15 | 3.5× |
| drive system |
|
81 | 8 | 13.2× |
| body and structure |
|
51 | 5.1 | 12.5× |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
40 | 4 | 2.0× |
| tyres and wheels |
|
24 | 2.4 | 1.8× |
| structure and attachments |
|
20 | 2 | 2.8× |
| fuel and exhaust |
|
18 | 1.8 | 3.6× |
| suspension |
|
12 | 1.2 | 2.0× |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the RS2 50 beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (PEUGEOT SPEEDFIGHT, PIAGGIO ZIP, PIAGGIO NRG).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the RS2 50.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2003 (50.8% pass). Weakest: 2007 (38.7%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.
RIEJU RS2 50 FAQ
Is the RIEJU RS2 50 reliable?
The RIEJU RS2 50 is less reliable than average for its class: 48.5% of its 619 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #5401 of 5426 models.
What does a RS2 50 fail its MOT on most?
lighting and signalling — 34% of all defects recorded against failed RS2 50 tests.
What is the best year of RS2 50 to buy used?
By first-time pass rate, 2003-registered examples do best (50.8%) and 2007 worst (38.7%). Condition and history still trump the year.