RIEJU MRT3 50 PRO SM
What fails on a MRT3 50 PRO SM
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| lamps and reflectors |
|
44 | 32.4 |
| structure and attachments |
|
34 | 25 |
| brakes |
|
24 | 17.6 |
| suspension |
|
19 | 14 |
| Identification of the vehicle |
|
7 | 5.1 |
| steering |
|
6 | 4.4 |
| audible warning (Horn) |
|
1 | 0.7 |
| wheels |
|
1 | 0.7 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the MRT3 50 PRO SM beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (PEUGEOT SPEEDFIGHT, PIAGGIO ZIP, PIAGGIO NRG).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the MRT3 50 PRO SM.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2019 (46.0% pass). Weakest: 2019 (46.0%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.