MUTT QM 250-2X MONGREL 250
Pass rate over time
The QM 250-2X MONGREL 250's first-time pass rate has risen 2.7 points since 2021, 81.0% to 83.7%.
What fails on a QM 250-2X MONGREL 250
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| lamps and reflectors |
|
26 | 42.6 |
| structure and attachments |
|
12 | 19.7 |
| brakes |
|
12 | 19.7 |
| steering |
|
4 | 6.6 |
| suspension |
|
3 | 4.9 |
| Identification of the vehicle |
|
2 | 3.3 |
| audible warning (Horn) |
|
1 | 1.6 |
| tyres |
|
1 | 1.6 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the QM 250-2X MONGREL 250 beats 3 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YP250, YAMAHA WR250F, HONDA XR250).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the QM 250-2X MONGREL 250.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2019 (86.0% pass). Weakest: 2018 (84.2%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.