BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ HONDA/XL 1000 V-4
Model report · 2005–2025

HONDA XL 1000 V-4

996cc Petrol Class 2
88.3%
first-time pass rate
7.0%
failed outright
20,283
median miles at test
669
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2007–2017

The XL 1000 V-4's first-time pass rate has risen 2.0 points since 2007, 91.8% to 93.8%.

78%88%97%2007: 91.8% pass (49 tests)2008: 91.9% pass (62 tests)2009: 90.7% pass (54 tests)2010: 90.7% pass (54 tests)2011: 81.5% pass (54 tests)2012: 93.3% pass (45 tests)2013: 86.7% pass (45 tests)2014: 92.3% pass (39 tests)2015: 86.5% pass (37 tests)2016: 83.3% pass (36 tests)2017: 93.8% pass (32 tests)20072017

Pass rate by mileage

how the XL 1000 V-4's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage XL 1000 V-4 passes first time 88.0% of the time; by 40k that's 91.3%.

83%88%93%0k: 88.0% pass (92 tests)10k: 89.2% pass (232 tests)20k: 89.9% pass (168 tests)30k: 84.4% pass (96 tests)40k: 91.3% pass (46 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a XL 1000 V-4

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
brakes
22 27.8 0.6×
steering and suspension
16 20.3 0.7×
tyres and wheels
8 10.1 0.6×
fuel and exhaust
6 7.6 1.2×
lamps and reflectors
6 7.6 0.5×
lighting and signalling
6 7.6 0.2×
tyres
4 5.1 0.9×
drive system
4 5.1 0.8×
suspension
4 5.1 0.6×
steering
3 3.8 1.1×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the XL 1000 V-4 beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (BMW R1200, BMW R1150, TRIUMPH SPRINT).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the XL 1000 V-4.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2005 (92.5% pass). Weakest: 2004 (86.7%).

86%90%94%2003: 91.9% pass (74 tests)2004: 86.7% pass (460 tests)2005: 92.5% pass (134 tests)200320042005

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HONDA XL 1000 V-4 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HONDA XL 1000 V-4 reliable?

The HONDA XL 1000 V-4 is more reliable than average for its class: 88.3% of its 669 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #1506 of 5426 models.

What does a XL 1000 V-4 fail its MOT on most?

brakes — 28% of all defects recorded against failed XL 1000 V-4 tests.

What is the best year of XL 1000 V-4 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2005-registered examples do best (92.5%) and 2004 worst (86.7%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a XL 1000 V-4 last?

The median XL 1000 V-4 shows 20,283 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 91.3% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.