BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

HONDA RVF400

399cc Petrol Class 2
81.1%
first-time pass rate
11.7%
failed outright
26,515
median miles at test
3,393
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2025

The RVF400's first-time pass rate has risen 19.5 points since 2005, 72.5% to 92.0%.

67%83%100%2005: 72.5% pass (51 tests)2006: 79.6% pass (338 tests)2007: 76.0% pass (283 tests)2008: 75.6% pass (287 tests)2009: 79.3% pass (270 tests)2010: 80.3% pass (239 tests)2011: 74.2% pass (221 tests)2012: 76.7% pass (210 tests)2013: 82.4% pass (204 tests)2014: 79.4% pass (199 tests)2015: 82.0% pass (172 tests)2016: 85.9% pass (149 tests)2017: 84.2% pass (139 tests)2018: 87.9% pass (91 tests)2019: 94.1% pass (102 tests)2020: 95.6% pass (68 tests)2021: 91.5% pass (82 tests)2022: 86.7% pass (83 tests)2023: 85.5% pass (76 tests)2024: 90.7% pass (54 tests)2025: 92.0% pass (75 tests)20052025

Pass rate by mileage

how the RVF400's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage RVF400 passes first time 86.0% of the time; by 50k that's 79.6%.

78%83%87%0k: 86.0% pass (157 tests)10k: 83.5% pass (805 tests)20k: 81.3% pass (1,088 tests)30k: 79.7% pass (679 tests)40k: 79.9% pass (378 tests)50k: 79.6% pass (162 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a RVF400

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
309 32.5 1.5×
steering and suspension
192 20.2 1.4×
brakes
151 15.9 0.8×
tyres and wheels
107 11.3 1.3×
reg plates and vin
45 4.7 1.7×
fuel and exhaust
45 4.7 1.6×
drive system
34 3.6 1.2×
body and structure
32 3.4 1.5×
lamps and reflectors
23 2.4 0.3×
driving controls
12 1.3 1.5×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the RVF400 beats 3 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ER5, SUZUKI GS500, SUZUKI AN400).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the RVF400.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1999 (87.9% pass). Weakest: 1994 (78.1%).

76%83%90%1994: 78.1% pass (1,073 tests)1995: 79.5% pass (454 tests)1996: 78.5% pass (437 tests)1997: 81.9% pass (436 tests)1998: 86.4% pass (353 tests)1999: 87.9% pass (363 tests)2000: 83.5% pass (109 tests)2001: 80.4% pass (51 tests)199419982001

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HONDA RVF400 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HONDA RVF400 reliable?

The HONDA RVF400 is less reliable than average for its class: 81.1% of its 3,393 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3356 of 5426 models.

What does a RVF400 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 33% of all defects recorded against failed RVF400 tests.

What is the best year of RVF400 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1999-registered examples do best (87.9%) and 1994 worst (78.1%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a RVF400 last?

The median RVF400 shows 26,515 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 79.6% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.