BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

HONDA CRM250

250cc Petrol Class 2
78.7%
first-time pass rate
13.3%
failed outright
13,967
median miles at test
3,567
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2025

The CRM250's first-time pass rate has risen 14.7 points since 2005, 74.3% to 89.0%.

69%81%93%2005: 74.3% pass (74 tests)2006: 77.5% pass (307 tests)2007: 77.5% pass (276 tests)2008: 72.7% pass (264 tests)2009: 73.8% pass (248 tests)2010: 73.6% pass (242 tests)2011: 72.9% pass (229 tests)2012: 77.2% pass (215 tests)2013: 81.2% pass (202 tests)2014: 81.4% pass (194 tests)2015: 81.8% pass (165 tests)2016: 79.6% pass (152 tests)2017: 81.8% pass (143 tests)2018: 78.5% pass (121 tests)2019: 86.7% pass (105 tests)2020: 80.0% pass (100 tests)2021: 81.5% pass (124 tests)2022: 89.0% pass (127 tests)2023: 85.0% pass (107 tests)2024: 84.0% pass (81 tests)2025: 89.0% pass (91 tests)20052025

Pass rate by mileage

how the CRM250's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage CRM250 passes first time 78.5% of the time; by 40k that's 83.6%.

77%81%85%0k: 78.5% pass (1,156 tests)10k: 78.7% pass (1,328 tests)20k: 78.7% pass (701 tests)30k: 79.9% pass (199 tests)40k: 83.6% pass (67 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a CRM250

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
390 30 1.5×
steering and suspension
295 22.7 2.0×
brakes
180 13.8 0.9×
tyres and wheels
174 13.4 1.8×
reg plates and vin
103 7.9 3.9×
lamps and reflectors
51 3.9 0.5×
drive system
49 3.8 1.6×
suspension
35 2.7 1.0×
Items Not Tested
12 0.9 1.5×
structure and attachments
11 0.8 0.4×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the CRM250 beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YP250, YAMAHA WR250F, HONDA XR250).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the CRM250.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2000 (84.7% pass). Weakest: 1993 (69.5%).

66%77%88%1989: 77.0% pass (261 tests)1991: 76.4% pass (569 tests)1992: 75.3% pass (450 tests)1993: 69.5% pass (354 tests)1994: 84.3% pass (134 tests)1995: 78.0% pass (327 tests)1997: 82.3% pass (328 tests)1998: 84.3% pass (280 tests)1999: 80.6% pass (444 tests)2000: 84.7% pass (137 tests)198919952000

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HONDA CRM250 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HONDA CRM250 reliable?

The HONDA CRM250 is less reliable than average for its class: 78.7% of its 3,567 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3816 of 5426 models.

What does a CRM250 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 30% of all defects recorded against failed CRM250 tests.

What is the best year of CRM250 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2000-registered examples do best (84.7%) and 1993 worst (69.5%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a CRM250 last?

The median CRM250 shows 13,967 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 83.6% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.