BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

HONDA CRM

250cc Petrol Class 2
80.4%
first-time pass rate
12.2%
failed outright
15,480
median miles at test
1,957
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2025

The CRM's first-time pass rate has risen 5.9 points since 2005, 75.7% to 81.6%.

66%81%95%2005: 75.7% pass (37 tests)2006: 79.0% pass (157 tests)2007: 81.9% pass (138 tests)2008: 75.4% pass (134 tests)2009: 77.8% pass (135 tests)2010: 76.5% pass (132 tests)2011: 75.2% pass (129 tests)2012: 73.6% pass (121 tests)2013: 84.4% pass (122 tests)2014: 71.1% pass (114 tests)2015: 80.6% pass (103 tests)2016: 90.1% pass (91 tests)2017: 86.9% pass (84 tests)2018: 85.9% pass (71 tests)2019: 85.2% pass (54 tests)2020: 89.1% pass (55 tests)2021: 84.1% pass (63 tests)2022: 87.9% pass (66 tests)2023: 88.9% pass (54 tests)2024: 79.2% pass (48 tests)2025: 81.6% pass (49 tests)20052025

Pass rate by mileage

how the CRM's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage CRM passes first time 76.8% of the time; by 40k that's 87.5%.

75%82%90%0k: 76.8% pass (461 tests)10k: 80.0% pass (885 tests)20k: 82.4% pass (425 tests)30k: 85.2% pass (115 tests)40k: 87.5% pass (32 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a CRM

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
210 34.3 1.3×
steering and suspension
126 20.6 1.5×
brakes
93 15.2 0.8×
tyres and wheels
64 10.4 1.2×
lamps and reflectors
31 5.1 0.6×
reg plates and vin
30 4.9 2.4×
drive system
23 3.8 1.4×
suspension
21 3.4 1.2×
Identification of the vehicle
8 1.3 1.8×
driving controls
7 1.1 1.5×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the CRM beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YP250, YAMAHA WR250F, HONDA XR250).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the CRM.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1999 (86.8% pass). Weakest: 1994 (71.6%).

69%79%90%1989: 74.0% pass (100 tests)1991: 79.5% pass (361 tests)1992: 79.6% pass (274 tests)1993: 77.9% pass (199 tests)1994: 71.6% pass (74 tests)1995: 81.8% pass (132 tests)1997: 83.0% pass (188 tests)1998: 82.5% pass (160 tests)1999: 86.8% pass (220 tests)2000: 77.3% pass (66 tests)198919952000

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HONDA CRM FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HONDA CRM reliable?

The HONDA CRM is less reliable than average for its class: 80.4% of its 1,957 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3493 of 5426 models.

What does a CRM fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 34% of all defects recorded against failed CRM tests.

What is the best year of CRM to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1999-registered examples do best (86.8%) and 1994 worst (71.6%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a CRM last?

The median CRM shows 15,480 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 87.5% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.