BIKERELIABILITY Reg check
League table/ Pulse Adrenaline/vs Honda CBF250
Head-to-head · 2005–2025

Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025

Pulse Adrenaline vs Honda CBF250

The Honda CBF250 passes its MOT first time more often than the Pulse Adrenaline: 84.9% vs 69.2%, a 15.7-point lead.

MOT reliability, side by side

first-time pass rate, outright fail rate and tests analysed · 2005–2025
Metric Pulse Adrenaline Honda CBF250
First-time pass rate 69.2% 84.9%
Outright fail rate 22.0% 8.1%
Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) -10.3 pts -1.4 pts
Engine size 249cc 249cc
Rank among all models #4794 of 5428 #2516 of 5428
Median miles at test 6,998 10,566
MOT tests analysed 930 7,536
Most common failure lighting and signalling brakes

First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.

"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.

What fails, side by side

share of each bike's MOT tests that failed on the component · lower is better
Component Pulse Adrenaline Honda CBF250
Lights & signalling 13.7% 2.8%
Steering & suspension 10.6% 2.8%
Brakes 8.3% 2.5%
Tyres & wheels 5.5% 2.0%
Drive system 4.0% 1.6%
Structure & body 4.4% 0.5%
Fuel & exhaust 0.4% 0.1%

A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.

Pass rate by test year

first-time MOT pass rate in each calendar year both bikes were tested
Test year Pulse Adrenaline Honda CBF250
2018 80.3% 84.0%
2019 77.1% 81.6%
2020 84.6% 88.6%
2021 82.5% 89.2%
2022 71.1% 90.5%
2023 82.3% 88.1%
2024 89.7% 85.6%
2025 91.2% 85.7%

Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.

Pass rate by mileage

first-time MOT pass rate by miles on the clock at test
Mileage Pulse Adrenaline Honda CBF250
0k-10k miles 76.9% 88.5%
10k-20k miles 57.1% 82.6%
20k-30k miles 51.9% 81.6%

Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.

Pulse Adrenaline vs Honda CBF250 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Which is more reliable, the Pulse Adrenaline or the Honda CBF250?

The Honda CBF250 passes its MOT first time more often than the Pulse Adrenaline: 84.9% vs 69.2%, a 15.7-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class, the Honda CBF250 still comes out ahead: -10.3 points vs comparable bikes for the Pulse Adrenaline, -1.4 for the Honda CBF250. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.

What does the Pulse Adrenaline fail its MOT on most?

Lights & signalling: 13.7% of Pulse Adrenaline MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (10.6%).

What does the Honda CBF250 fail its MOT on most?

Lights & signalling: 2.8% of Honda CBF250 MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (2.8%).

Which holds up better at high mileage, the Pulse Adrenaline or the Honda CBF250?

At 20k-30k miles the Honda CBF250 passes first time more often: 51.9% for the Pulse Adrenaline vs 81.6% for the Honda CBF250.

See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.