Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Norton Commando 750 vs Yamaha FZS600
The Norton Commando 750 passes its MOT first time more often than the Yamaha FZS600: 90.2% vs 82.6%, a 7.6-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Norton Commando 750 | Yamaha FZS600 |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 90.2% | 82.6% |
| Outright fail rate | 4.3% | 10.6% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | +2.5 pts | -0.8 pts |
| Engine size | 750cc | 599cc |
| Rank among all models | #884 of 5428 | #3052 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 14,118 | 21,612 |
| MOT tests analysed | 869 | 136,558 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | brakes |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
What fails, side by side
| Component | Norton Commando 750 | Yamaha FZS600 |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & signalling | 2.4% | 3.4% |
| Brakes | 0.6% | 4.5% |
| Tyres & wheels | 1.2% | 2.9% |
| Steering & suspension | 1.3% | 2.7% |
| Fuel & exhaust | 0.7% | 1.1% |
| Drive system | 0.5% | 0.9% |
| Structure & body | 0.1% | 1.1% |
A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.
Pass rate by test year
| Test year | Norton Commando 750 | Yamaha FZS600 |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 85.7% | 82.0% |
| 2011 | 93.5% | 81.1% |
| 2012 | 87.0% | 80.2% |
| 2013 | 94.0% | 81.3% |
| 2014 | 96.3% | 81.2% |
| 2015 | 93.5% | 81.1% |
| 2016 | 91.2% | 82.2% |
| 2017 | 95.2% | 82.0% |
Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Norton Commando 750 | Yamaha FZS600 |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 91.1% | 89.6% |
| 10k-20k miles | 88.7% | 85.5% |
| 20k-30k miles | 87.0% | 81.4% |
| 30k-40k miles | 97.0% | 78.7% |
| 40k-50k miles | 95.7% | 76.8% |
| 50k-60k miles | 87.5% | 74.7% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
Norton Commando 750 vs Yamaha FZS600 FAQ
Which is more reliable, the Norton Commando 750 or the Yamaha FZS600?
The Norton Commando 750 passes its MOT first time more often than the Yamaha FZS600: 90.2% vs 82.6%, a 7.6-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class, the Norton Commando 750 still comes out ahead: +2.5 points vs comparable bikes for the Norton Commando 750, -0.8 for the Yamaha FZS600. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.
What does the Norton Commando 750 fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 2.4% of Norton Commando 750 MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (1.3%).
What does the Yamaha FZS600 fail its MOT on most?
Brakes: 4.5% of Yamaha FZS600 MOT tests failed on it, then lights & signalling (3.4%).
Which holds up better at high mileage, the Norton Commando 750 or the Yamaha FZS600?
At 50k-60k miles the Norton Commando 750 passes first time more often: 87.5% for the Norton Commando 750 vs 74.7% for the Yamaha FZS600.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.