Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Norton Comando vs Suzuki GSF600
The Norton Comando passes its MOT first time more often than the Suzuki GSF600: 92.6% vs 77.3%, a 15.3-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Norton Comando | Suzuki GSF600 |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 92.6% | 77.3% |
| Outright fail rate | 3.1% | 14.2% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | +8.5 pts | -6.1 pts |
| Engine size | 750cc | 599cc |
| Rank among all models | #367 of 5428 | #4013 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 20,686 | 21,080 |
| MOT tests analysed | 1,012 | 143,023 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | brakes |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
What fails, side by side
| Component | Norton Comando | Suzuki GSF600 |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & signalling | 1.7% | 6.7% |
| Brakes | 1.2% | 6.1% |
| Steering & suspension | 0.3% | 3.6% |
| Tyres & wheels | 0.3% | 3.3% |
| Drive system | 0.4% | 1.4% |
| Structure & body | 0% | 1.5% |
| Fuel & exhaust | 0% | 1.2% |
A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.
Pass rate by test year
| Test year | Norton Comando | Suzuki GSF600 |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 92.0% | 75.8% |
| 2011 | 88.3% | 76.1% |
| 2012 | 90.7% | 75.9% |
| 2013 | 89.7% | 74.7% |
| 2014 | 97.4% | 75.0% |
| 2015 | 93.9% | 75.5% |
| 2016 | 90.1% | 76.1% |
| 2017 | 92.1% | 77.0% |
Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Norton Comando | Suzuki GSF600 |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 91.4% | 86.8% |
| 10k-20k miles | 96.1% | 80.1% |
| 20k-30k miles | 90.4% | 75.2% |
| 30k-40k miles | 92.4% | 71.3% |
| 40k-50k miles | 93.8% | 69.4% |
| 50k-60k miles | 93.4% | 68.3% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
Norton Comando vs Suzuki GSF600 FAQ
Which is more reliable, the Norton Comando or the Suzuki GSF600?
The Norton Comando passes its MOT first time more often than the Suzuki GSF600: 92.6% vs 77.3%, a 15.3-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class, the Norton Comando still comes out ahead: +8.5 points vs comparable bikes for the Norton Comando, -6.1 for the Suzuki GSF600. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.
What does the Norton Comando fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 1.7% of Norton Comando MOT tests failed on it, then brakes (1.2%).
What does the Suzuki GSF600 fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 6.7% of Suzuki GSF600 MOT tests failed on it, then brakes (6.1%).
Which holds up better at high mileage, the Norton Comando or the Suzuki GSF600?
At 50k-60k miles the Norton Comando passes first time more often: 93.4% for the Norton Comando vs 68.3% for the Suzuki GSF600.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.