BIKERELIABILITY Reg check
League table/ Norton Atlas/vs Yamaha FZS600
Head-to-head · 2005–2025

Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025

Norton Atlas vs Yamaha FZS600

The Norton Atlas passes its MOT first time more often than the Yamaha FZS600: 92.5% vs 82.6%, a 9.9-point lead.

MOT reliability, side by side

first-time pass rate, outright fail rate and tests analysed · 2005–2025
Metric Norton Atlas Yamaha FZS600
First-time pass rate 92.5% 82.6%
Outright fail rate 2.2% 10.6%
Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) +8.0 pts -0.8 pts
Engine size 750cc 599cc
Rank among all models #384 of 5428 #3052 of 5428
Median miles at test 8,598 21,612
MOT tests analysed 1,153 136,558
Most common failure lighting and signalling brakes

First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.

"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.

What fails, side by side

share of each bike's MOT tests that failed on the component · lower is better
Component Norton Atlas Yamaha FZS600
Brakes 0.3% 4.5%
Lights & signalling 1.0% 3.4%
Tyres & wheels 0.5% 2.9%
Steering & suspension 0.6% 2.7%
Structure & body 0.3% 1.1%
Fuel & exhaust 0.2% 1.1%
Drive system 0% 0.9%

A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.

Pass rate by test year

first-time MOT pass rate in each calendar year both bikes were tested
Test year Norton Atlas Yamaha FZS600
2010 90.9% 82.0%
2011 90.4% 81.1%
2012 89.2% 80.2%
2013 93.2% 81.3%
2014 93.5% 81.2%
2015 91.8% 81.1%
2016 93.3% 82.2%
2017 92.6% 82.0%

Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.

Pass rate by mileage

first-time MOT pass rate by miles on the clock at test
Mileage Norton Atlas Yamaha FZS600
0k-10k miles 92.2% 89.6%
10k-20k miles 92.6% 85.5%
20k-30k miles 89.6% 81.4%
30k-40k miles 100.0% 78.7%
40k-50k miles 97.1% 76.8%

Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.

Norton Atlas vs Yamaha FZS600 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Which is more reliable, the Norton Atlas or the Yamaha FZS600?

The Norton Atlas passes its MOT first time more often than the Yamaha FZS600: 92.5% vs 82.6%, a 9.9-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class, the Norton Atlas still comes out ahead: +8.0 points vs comparable bikes for the Norton Atlas, -0.8 for the Yamaha FZS600. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.

What does the Norton Atlas fail its MOT on most?

Lights & signalling: 1.0% of Norton Atlas MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (0.6%).

What does the Yamaha FZS600 fail its MOT on most?

Brakes: 4.5% of Yamaha FZS600 MOT tests failed on it, then lights & signalling (3.4%).

Which holds up better at high mileage, the Norton Atlas or the Yamaha FZS600?

At 40k-50k miles the Norton Atlas passes first time more often: 97.1% for the Norton Atlas vs 76.8% for the Yamaha FZS600.

See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.