BIKERELIABILITY Reg check
League table/ MZ TS250/vs Yamaha WR250F
Head-to-head · 2005–2025

Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025

MZ TS250 vs Yamaha WR250F

The MZ TS250 passes its MOT first time more often than the Yamaha WR250F: 88.4% vs 78.0%, a 10.4-point lead.

MOT reliability, side by side

first-time pass rate, outright fail rate and tests analysed · 2005–2025
Metric MZ TS250 Yamaha WR250F
First-time pass rate 88.4% 78.0%
Outright fail rate 4.7% 12.8%
Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) +3.8 pts -10.7 pts
Engine size 243cc 249cc
Rank among all models #1478 of 5428 #3913 of 5428
Median miles at test 22,824 3,018
MOT tests analysed 1,408 10,465
Most common failure lighting and signalling lighting and signalling

First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.

"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.

What fails, side by side

share of each bike's MOT tests that failed on the component · lower is better
Component MZ TS250 Yamaha WR250F
Lights & signalling 2.3% 8.2%
Steering & suspension 0.9% 5.1%
Tyres & wheels 1.2% 3.0%
Brakes 1.5% 2.2%
Structure & body 0.4% 0.5%
Fuel & exhaust 0.4% 0.4%
Drive system 0% 0.7%

A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.

Pass rate by test year

first-time MOT pass rate in each calendar year both bikes were tested
Test year MZ TS250 Yamaha WR250F
2012 92.2% 76.5%
2013 82.4% 75.7%
2014 87.3% 77.9%
2015 90.7% 77.3%
2016 90.7% 78.9%
2017 89.1% 80.3%
2018 90.9% 79.2%
2019 90.0% 77.2%

Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.

Pass rate by mileage

first-time MOT pass rate by miles on the clock at test
Mileage MZ TS250 Yamaha WR250F
0k-10k miles 90.8% 78.1%
10k-20k miles 88.1% 77.3%
20k-30k miles 86.9% 67.9%

Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.

MZ TS250 vs Yamaha WR250F FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Which is more reliable, the MZ TS250 or the Yamaha WR250F?

The MZ TS250 passes its MOT first time more often than the Yamaha WR250F: 88.4% vs 78.0%, a 10.4-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class, the MZ TS250 still comes out ahead: +3.8 points vs comparable bikes for the MZ TS250, -10.7 for the Yamaha WR250F. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.

What does the MZ TS250 fail its MOT on most?

Lights & signalling: 2.3% of MZ TS250 MOT tests failed on it, then brakes (1.5%).

What does the Yamaha WR250F fail its MOT on most?

Lights & signalling: 8.2% of Yamaha WR250F MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (5.1%).

Which holds up better at high mileage, the MZ TS250 or the Yamaha WR250F?

At 20k-30k miles the MZ TS250 passes first time more often: 86.9% for the MZ TS250 vs 67.9% for the Yamaha WR250F.

See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.