BIKERELIABILITY Reg check
League table/ MZ ETZ301/vs Yamaha YP250
Head-to-head · 2005–2025

Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025

MZ ETZ301 vs Yamaha YP250

The MZ ETZ301 passes its MOT first time more often than the Yamaha YP250: 84.1% vs 82.5%, a 1.6-point lead.

MOT reliability, side by side

first-time pass rate, outright fail rate and tests analysed · 2005–2025
Metric MZ ETZ301 Yamaha YP250
First-time pass rate 84.1% 82.5%
Outright fail rate 8.0% 12.3%
Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) +2.4 pts -2.3 pts
Engine size 291cc 249cc
Rank among all models #2721 of 5428 #3073 of 5428
Median miles at test 31,240 15,613
MOT tests analysed 675 12,433
Most common failure lighting and signalling brakes

First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.

"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.

What fails, side by side

share of each bike's MOT tests that failed on the component · lower is better
Component MZ ETZ301 Yamaha YP250
Brakes 2.4% 5.3%
Lights & signalling 5.2% 2.5%
Steering & suspension 1.5% 5.0%
Tyres & wheels 1.8% 3.8%
Fuel & exhaust 0.6% 0.8%
Structure & body 0.1% 0.5%
Drive system 0.1% 0.0%

A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.

Pass rate by test year

first-time MOT pass rate in each calendar year both bikes were tested
Test year MZ ETZ301 Yamaha YP250
2008 74.5% 80.8%
2009 75.5% 81.8%
2010 82.6% 81.3%
2011 89.2% 80.4%
2012 78.9% 83.9%
2013 87.8% 83.1%
2014 91.2% 81.4%
2015 86.7% 84.2%

Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.

Pass rate by mileage

first-time MOT pass rate by miles on the clock at test
Mileage MZ ETZ301 Yamaha YP250
0k-10k miles 88.2% 88.6%
10k-20k miles 88.2% 82.5%
20k-30k miles 87.7% 78.6%
30k-40k miles 87.7% 77.0%
40k-50k miles 75.8% 71.9%
50k-60k miles 79.3% 84.7%

Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.

MZ ETZ301 vs Yamaha YP250 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Which is more reliable, the MZ ETZ301 or the Yamaha YP250?

The MZ ETZ301 passes its MOT first time more often than the Yamaha YP250: 84.1% vs 82.5%, a 1.6-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class, the MZ ETZ301 still comes out ahead: +2.4 points vs comparable bikes for the MZ ETZ301, -2.3 for the Yamaha YP250. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.

What does the MZ ETZ301 fail its MOT on most?

Lights & signalling: 5.2% of MZ ETZ301 MOT tests failed on it, then brakes (2.4%).

What does the Yamaha YP250 fail its MOT on most?

Brakes: 5.3% of Yamaha YP250 MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (5.0%).

Which holds up better at high mileage, the MZ ETZ301 or the Yamaha YP250?

At 50k-60k miles the Yamaha YP250 passes first time more often: 79.3% for the MZ ETZ301 vs 84.7% for the Yamaha YP250.

See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.