Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
MZ Etz vs Honda XR250
The MZ Etz passes its MOT first time more often than the Honda XR250: 86.4% vs 78.8%, a 7.6-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | MZ Etz | Honda XR250 |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 86.4% | 78.8% |
| Outright fail rate | 5.8% | 12.3% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | +5.5 pts | -6.8 pts |
| Engine size | 243cc | 249cc |
| Rank among all models | #2091 of 5428 | #3805 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 24,446 | 8,618 |
| MOT tests analysed | 639 | 9,277 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | lighting and signalling |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
What fails, side by side
| Component | MZ Etz | Honda XR250 |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & signalling | 2.8% | 7.1% |
| Brakes | 2.5% | 3.8% |
| Steering & suspension | 0.9% | 4.8% |
| Tyres & wheels | 1.3% | 3.0% |
| Structure & body | 0.8% | 0.8% |
| Drive system | 0% | 0.8% |
| Fuel & exhaust | 0% | 0.5% |
A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.
Pass rate by test year
| Test year | MZ Etz | Honda XR250 |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 82.4% | 74.6% |
| 2012 | 86.1% | 77.6% |
| 2013 | 88.1% | 75.4% |
| 2014 | 75.0% | 77.8% |
| 2015 | 85.4% | 80.5% |
| 2016 | 94.7% | 78.9% |
| 2017 | 89.5% | 78.2% |
| 2018 | 96.8% | 83.3% |
Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | MZ Etz | Honda XR250 |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 89.0% | 79.5% |
| 10k-20k miles | 83.3% | 78.9% |
| 20k-30k miles | 88.2% | 78.3% |
| 30k-40k miles | 93.3% | 77.7% |
| 40k-50k miles | 79.3% | 74.1% |
| 50k-60k miles | 91.2% | 83.3% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
MZ Etz vs Honda XR250 FAQ
Which is more reliable, the MZ Etz or the Honda XR250?
The MZ Etz passes its MOT first time more often than the Honda XR250: 86.4% vs 78.8%, a 7.6-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class, the MZ Etz still comes out ahead: +5.5 points vs comparable bikes for the MZ Etz, -6.8 for the Honda XR250. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.
What does the MZ Etz fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 2.8% of MZ Etz MOT tests failed on it, then brakes (2.5%).
What does the Honda XR250 fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 7.1% of Honda XR250 MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (4.8%).
Which holds up better at high mileage, the MZ Etz or the Honda XR250?
At 50k-60k miles the MZ Etz passes first time more often: 91.2% for the MZ Etz vs 83.3% for the Honda XR250.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.