Moto Guzzi Nevada Classic vs Triumph Sprint

The Moto Guzzi Nevada Classic passes its MOT first time more often than the Triumph Sprint: 90.5% vs 85.6%, a 4.9-point lead.

MOT reliability, side by side

first-time pass rate, outright fail rate and tests analysed · 2005–2025

Metric	Moto Guzzi Nevada Classic	Triumph Sprint
First-time pass rate	90.5%	85.6%
Outright fail rate	4.6%	8.8%
Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted)	+3.7 pts	+1.8 pts
Engine size	744cc	955cc
Rank among all models	#800 of 5428	#2333 of 5428
Median miles at test	8,817	20,615
MOT tests analysed	1,108	132,827
Most common failure	tyres and wheels	brakes

First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.

"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.

What fails, side by side

share of each bike's MOT tests that failed on the component · lower is better

Component	Moto Guzzi Nevada Classic	Triumph Sprint
Brakes	1.1%	3.7%
Lights & signalling	1.8%	2.8%
Tyres & wheels	2.4%	2.2%
Steering & suspension	0.7%	2.5%
Structure & body	0.2%	0.6%
Drive system	0%	0.4%
Fuel & exhaust	0%	0.2%

A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.

Pass rate by test year

first-time MOT pass rate in each calendar year both bikes were tested

Test year	Moto Guzzi Nevada Classic	Triumph Sprint
2018	90.0%	86.2%
2019	96.2%	86.1%
2020	95.6%	86.4%
2021	95.7%	86.7%
2022	91.2%	85.9%
2023	84.7%	86.4%
2024	86.3%	86.8%
2025	89.6%	86.8%

Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.

Pass rate by mileage

first-time MOT pass rate by miles on the clock at test

Mileage	Moto Guzzi Nevada Classic	Triumph Sprint
0k-10k miles	92.0%	90.9%
10k-20k miles	88.0%	87.5%
20k-30k miles	89.9%	85.0%
30k-40k miles	93.5%	82.1%

Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.

Moto Guzzi Nevada Classic vs Triumph Sprint FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Which is more reliable, the Moto Guzzi Nevada Classic or the Triumph Sprint?

The Moto Guzzi Nevada Classic passes its MOT first time more often than the Triumph Sprint: 90.5% vs 85.6%, a 4.9-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class, the Moto Guzzi Nevada Classic still comes out ahead: +3.7 points vs comparable bikes for the Moto Guzzi Nevada Classic, +1.8 for the Triumph Sprint. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.

What does the Moto Guzzi Nevada Classic fail its MOT on most?

Tyres & wheels: 2.4% of Moto Guzzi Nevada Classic MOT tests failed on it, then lights & signalling (1.8%).

What does the Triumph Sprint fail its MOT on most?

Brakes: 3.7% of Triumph Sprint MOT tests failed on it, then lights & signalling (2.8%).

Which holds up better at high mileage, the Moto Guzzi Nevada Classic or the Triumph Sprint?

At 30k-40k miles the Moto Guzzi Nevada Classic passes first time more often: 93.5% for the Moto Guzzi Nevada Classic vs 82.1% for the Triumph Sprint.

MOTO GUZZI NEVADA CLASSIC 90.5% pass · 1,108 tests TRIUMPH SPRINT 85.6% pass · 133k tests

See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.