Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Kymco Pulsar LX 125 vs Honda PCX 125
The Honda PCX 125 passes its MOT first time more often than the Kymco Pulsar LX 125: 81.1% vs 66.6%, a 14.5-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Kymco Pulsar LX 125 | Honda PCX 125 |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 66.6% | 81.1% |
| Outright fail rate | 23.1% | 12.9% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | -3.8 pts | +8.2 pts |
| Engine size | 124cc | 125cc |
| Rank among all models | #4931 of 5428 | #3358 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 13,532 | 16,405 |
| MOT tests analysed | 1,160 | 88,608 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | brakes |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
What fails, side by side
| Component | Kymco Pulsar LX 125 | Honda PCX 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & signalling | 14.1% | 3.9% |
| Brakes | 7.2% | 6.7% |
| Steering & suspension | 9.5% | 4.4% |
| Tyres & wheels | 3.5% | 5.3% |
| Drive system | 7.1% | 0.0% |
| Structure & body | 4.7% | 0.7% |
| Fuel & exhaust | 2.7% | 0.0% |
A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.
Pass rate by test year
| Test year | Kymco Pulsar LX 125 | Honda PCX 125 |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 65.8% | 85.2% |
| 2014 | 64.5% | 84.4% |
| 2015 | 67.2% | 83.5% |
| 2016 | 63.8% | 82.5% |
| 2017 | 68.6% | 80.5% |
| 2018 | 65.8% | 81.2% |
Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Kymco Pulsar LX 125 | Honda PCX 125 |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 77.5% | 88.4% |
| 10k-20k miles | 62.0% | 79.3% |
| 20k-30k miles | 57.1% | 78.0% |
| 30k-40k miles | 55.8% | 77.0% |
| 40k-50k miles | 74.2% | 74.8% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
Kymco Pulsar LX 125 vs Honda PCX 125 FAQ
Which is more reliable, the Kymco Pulsar LX 125 or the Honda PCX 125?
The Honda PCX 125 passes its MOT first time more often than the Kymco Pulsar LX 125: 81.1% vs 66.6%, a 14.5-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class, the Honda PCX 125 still comes out ahead: -3.8 points vs comparable bikes for the Kymco Pulsar LX 125, +8.2 for the Honda PCX 125. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.
What does the Kymco Pulsar LX 125 fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 14.1% of Kymco Pulsar LX 125 MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (9.5%).
What does the Honda PCX 125 fail its MOT on most?
Brakes: 6.7% of Honda PCX 125 MOT tests failed on it, then tyres & wheels (5.3%).
Which holds up better at high mileage, the Kymco Pulsar LX 125 or the Honda PCX 125?
They are level: at 40k-50k miles the Kymco Pulsar LX 125 passes 74.2% first time and the Honda PCX 125 74.8%.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.