Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Cagiva Elefant-750 vs Yamaha FZS600
The Yamaha FZS600 passes its MOT first time more often than the Cagiva Elefant-750: 82.6% vs 79.2%, a 3.4-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Cagiva Elefant-750 | Yamaha FZS600 |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 79.2% | 82.6% |
| Outright fail rate | 10.5% | 10.6% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | -2.3 pts | -0.8 pts |
| Engine size | 748cc | 599cc |
| Rank among all models | #3734 of 5428 | #3052 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 29,606 | 21,612 |
| MOT tests analysed | 505 | 136,558 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | brakes |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
What fails, side by side
| Component | Cagiva Elefant-750 | Yamaha FZS600 |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & signalling | 7.9% | 3.4% |
| Brakes | 3.2% | 4.5% |
| Steering & suspension | 2.6% | 2.7% |
| Tyres & wheels | 1.2% | 2.9% |
| Drive system | 0.8% | 0.9% |
| Fuel & exhaust | 0.4% | 1.1% |
| Structure & body | 0.4% | 1.1% |
A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.
Pass rate by test year
| Test year | Cagiva Elefant-750 | Yamaha FZS600 |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 81.3% | 86.0% |
| 2007 | 88.9% | 84.1% |
| 2008 | 74.4% | 83.4% |
| 2009 | 71.8% | 81.2% |
| 2010 | 69.7% | 82.0% |
| 2011 | 82.5% | 81.1% |
Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Cagiva Elefant-750 | Yamaha FZS600 |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 89.1% | 89.6% |
| 10k-20k miles | 75.5% | 85.5% |
| 20k-30k miles | 78.7% | 81.4% |
| 30k-40k miles | 77.4% | 78.7% |
| 40k-50k miles | 81.8% | 76.8% |
| 50k-60k miles | 78.1% | 74.7% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
Cagiva Elefant-750 vs Yamaha FZS600 FAQ
Which is more reliable, the Cagiva Elefant-750 or the Yamaha FZS600?
The Yamaha FZS600 passes its MOT first time more often than the Cagiva Elefant-750: 82.6% vs 79.2%, a 3.4-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class, the Yamaha FZS600 still comes out ahead: -2.3 points vs comparable bikes for the Cagiva Elefant-750, -0.8 for the Yamaha FZS600. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.
What does the Cagiva Elefant-750 fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 7.9% of Cagiva Elefant-750 MOT tests failed on it, then brakes (3.2%).
What does the Yamaha FZS600 fail its MOT on most?
Brakes: 4.5% of Yamaha FZS600 MOT tests failed on it, then lights & signalling (3.4%).
Which holds up better at high mileage, the Cagiva Elefant-750 or the Yamaha FZS600?
At 50k-60k miles the Cagiva Elefant-750 passes first time more often: 78.1% for the Cagiva Elefant-750 vs 74.7% for the Yamaha FZS600.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.