Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Beta Alp 4T-200 vs Honda CBF250
The Honda CBF250 passes its MOT first time more often than the Beta Alp 4T-200: 84.9% vs 81.5%, a 3.4-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Beta Alp 4T-200 | Honda CBF250 |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 81.5% | 84.9% |
| Outright fail rate | 9.5% | 8.1% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | +2.8 pts | -1.4 pts |
| Engine size | 199cc | 249cc |
| Rank among all models | #3270 of 5428 | #2516 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 3,872 | 10,566 |
| MOT tests analysed | 1,144 | 7,536 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | brakes |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
What fails, side by side
| Component | Beta Alp 4T-200 | Honda CBF250 |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & signalling | 5.6% | 2.8% |
| Steering & suspension | 4.4% | 2.8% |
| Brakes | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Tyres & wheels | 1.3% | 2.0% |
| Drive system | 0.6% | 1.6% |
| Structure & body | 0.6% | 0.5% |
| Fuel & exhaust | 0.1% | 0.1% |
A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.
Pass rate by test year
| Test year | Beta Alp 4T-200 | Honda CBF250 |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 76.4% | 84.0% |
| 2019 | 72.7% | 81.6% |
| 2020 | 80.0% | 88.6% |
| 2021 | 80.0% | 89.2% |
| 2022 | 84.6% | 90.5% |
| 2023 | 83.0% | 88.1% |
| 2024 | 86.4% | 85.6% |
| 2025 | 78.9% | 85.7% |
Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Beta Alp 4T-200 | Honda CBF250 |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 82.0% | 88.5% |
| 10k-20k miles | 82.5% | 82.6% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
Beta Alp 4T-200 vs Honda CBF250 FAQ
Which is more reliable, the Beta Alp 4T-200 or the Honda CBF250?
The Honda CBF250 passes its MOT first time more often than the Beta Alp 4T-200: 84.9% vs 81.5%, a 3.4-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class, the Beta Alp 4T-200 still comes out ahead: +2.8 points vs comparable bikes for the Beta Alp 4T-200, -1.4 for the Honda CBF250. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.
What does the Beta Alp 4T-200 fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 5.6% of Beta Alp 4T-200 MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (4.4%).
What does the Honda CBF250 fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 2.8% of Honda CBF250 MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (2.8%).
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.