Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Barossa XS 125 T-13 vs Honda CG125
The Honda CG125 passes its MOT first time more often than the Barossa XS 125 T-13: 72.2% vs 69.3%, a 2.9-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Barossa XS 125 T-13 | Honda CG125 |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 69.3% | 72.2% |
| Outright fail rate | 19.5% | 16.8% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | -2.0 pts | +0.7 pts |
| Engine size | 125cc | 124cc |
| Rank among all models | #4785 of 5428 | #4568 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 10,118 | 17,460 |
| MOT tests analysed | 796 | 89,345 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | lighting and signalling |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
What fails, side by side
| Component | Barossa XS 125 T-13 | Honda CG125 |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & signalling | 12.4% | 10.0% |
| Steering & suspension | 6.8% | 7.2% |
| Brakes | 6.0% | 5.1% |
| Tyres & wheels | 4.4% | 4.6% |
| Fuel & exhaust | 2.9% | 0.9% |
| Structure & body | 1.6% | 1.9% |
| Drive system | 0% | 2.6% |
A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.
Pass rate by test year
| Test year | Barossa XS 125 T-13 | Honda CG125 |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 65.7% | 70.6% |
| 2012 | 67.8% | 70.6% |
| 2013 | 72.3% | 69.4% |
| 2014 | 67.5% | 69.3% |
| 2015 | 63.4% | 70.9% |
| 2016 | 65.5% | 71.1% |
| 2017 | 75.6% | 72.7% |
Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Barossa XS 125 T-13 | Honda CG125 |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 74.6% | 79.3% |
| 10k-20k miles | 61.6% | 73.0% |
| 20k-30k miles | 77.0% | 68.3% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
Barossa XS 125 T-13 vs Honda CG125 FAQ
Which is more reliable, the Barossa XS 125 T-13 or the Honda CG125?
The Honda CG125 passes its MOT first time more often than the Barossa XS 125 T-13: 72.2% vs 69.3%, a 2.9-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class, the Honda CG125 still comes out ahead: -2.0 points vs comparable bikes for the Barossa XS 125 T-13, +0.7 for the Honda CG125. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.
What does the Barossa XS 125 T-13 fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 12.4% of Barossa XS 125 T-13 MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (6.8%).
What does the Honda CG125 fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 10.0% of Honda CG125 MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (7.2%).
Which holds up better at high mileage, the Barossa XS 125 T-13 or the Honda CG125?
At 20k-30k miles the Barossa XS 125 T-13 passes first time more often: 77.0% for the Barossa XS 125 T-13 vs 68.3% for the Honda CG125.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.