Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Ariel Arrow vs Honda CBF250
The Ariel Arrow passes its MOT first time more often than the Honda CBF250: 93.7% vs 84.9%, a 8.8-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Ariel Arrow | Honda CBF250 |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 93.7% | 84.9% |
| Outright fail rate | 1.9% | 8.1% |
| Engine size | 250cc | 249cc |
| Rank among all models | #214 of 5428 | #2516 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 19,558 | 10,566 |
| MOT tests analysed | 1,615 | 7,536 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | brakes |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
What fails, side by side
| Component | Ariel Arrow | Honda CBF250 |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & signalling | 0.7% | 2.8% |
| Steering & suspension | 0.7% | 2.8% |
| Brakes | 0.6% | 2.5% |
| Tyres & wheels | 0.6% | 2.0% |
| Drive system | 0.1% | 1.6% |
| Structure & body | 0.3% | 0.5% |
| Fuel & exhaust | 0% | 0.1% |
A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.
Pass rate by test year
| Test year | Ariel Arrow | Honda CBF250 |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 90.6% | 82.9% |
| 2012 | 93.3% | 83.9% |
| 2013 | 95.1% | 82.9% |
| 2014 | 95.8% | 84.0% |
| 2015 | 95.9% | 82.4% |
| 2016 | 93.4% | 87.6% |
| 2017 | 94.9% | 84.2% |
| 2018 | 93.9% | 84.0% |
Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Ariel Arrow | Honda CBF250 |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 95.6% | 88.5% |
| 10k-20k miles | 95.6% | 82.6% |
| 20k-30k miles | 91.6% | 81.6% |
| 30k-40k miles | 91.7% | 77.0% |
| 40k-50k miles | 87.2% | 78.7% |
| 50k-60k miles | 95.8% | 80.3% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
Ariel Arrow vs Honda CBF250 FAQ
Which is more reliable, the Ariel Arrow or the Honda CBF250?
The Ariel Arrow passes its MOT first time more often than the Honda CBF250: 93.7% vs 84.9%, a 8.8-point lead. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.
What does the Ariel Arrow fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 0.7% of Ariel Arrow MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (0.7%).
What does the Honda CBF250 fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 2.8% of Honda CBF250 MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (2.8%).
Which holds up better at high mileage, the Ariel Arrow or the Honda CBF250?
At 50k-60k miles the Ariel Arrow passes first time more often: 95.8% for the Ariel Arrow vs 80.3% for the Honda CBF250.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.