BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ YAMAHA/CW 50 NG
Model report · 2005–2025

YAMAHA CW 50 NG

49cc Petrol Class 1
65.2%
first-time pass rate
26.9%
failed outright
8,134
median miles at test
871
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2013

The CW 50 NG's first-time pass rate has risen 2.5 points since 2005, 66.7% to 69.2%.

53%64%74%2005: 66.7% pass (30 tests)2006: 64.7% pass (156 tests)2007: 70.6% pass (119 tests)2008: 66.1% pass (118 tests)2009: 64.6% pass (96 tests)2010: 62.1% pass (66 tests)2011: 59.7% pass (67 tests)2012: 56.5% pass (62 tests)2013: 69.2% pass (39 tests)20052013

Pass rate by mileage

how the CW 50 NG's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage CW 50 NG passes first time 67.6% of the time; by 20k that's 48.4%.

45%58%71%0k: 67.6% pass (537 tests)10k: 62.1% pass (282 tests)20k: 48.4% pass (31 tests)0k10k20k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a CW 50 NG

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
298 41.5 4.4×
steering and suspension
196 27.3 4.9×
brakes
113 15.7 2.2×
tyres and wheels
33 4.6 1.8×
fuel and exhaust
28 3.9 3.6×
lamps and reflectors
16 2.2 0.5×
body and structure
11 1.5 2.4×
reg plates and vin
9 1.3 1.8×
Items Not Tested
8 1.1 8.7×
suspension
6 0.8 0.8×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the CW 50 NG beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (PEUGEOT SPEEDFIGHT, PIAGGIO ZIP, PIAGGIO NRG).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the CW 50 NG.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2005 (72.5% pass). Weakest: 2000 (60.8%).

58%67%75%1998: 64.4% pass (104 tests)1999: 62.3% pass (122 tests)2000: 60.8% pass (125 tests)2001: 70.8% pass (89 tests)2002: 66.3% pass (160 tests)2003: 64.0% pass (136 tests)2005: 72.5% pass (51 tests)199820012005

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

YAMAHA CW 50 NG FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the YAMAHA CW 50 NG reliable?

The YAMAHA CW 50 NG is less reliable than average for its class: 65.2% of its 871 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #5006 of 5426 models.

What does a CW 50 NG fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 42% of all defects recorded against failed CW 50 NG tests.

What is the best year of CW 50 NG to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2005-registered examples do best (72.5%) and 2000 worst (60.8%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a CW 50 NG last?

The median CW 50 NG shows 8,134 miles at test, and examples around 20k miles still pass 48.4% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.