Model report · 2005–2025
SUZUKI XF 650 V
644cc
Petrol
Class 2
82.2%
first-time pass rate
11.9%
failed outright
16,182
median miles at test
118
MOT tests, 2005–2025
What fails on a XF 650 V
failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| brakes |
|
13 | 34.2 |
| steering and suspension |
|
8 | 21.1 |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
5 | 13.2 |
| lighting and signalling |
|
3 | 7.9 |
| drive system |
|
2 | 5.3 |
| suspension |
|
2 | 5.3 |
| structure and attachments |
|
2 | 5.3 |
| tyres and wheels |
|
1 | 2.6 |
| body and structure |
|
1 | 2.6 |
| Identification of the vehicle |
|
1 | 2.6 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
same type, similar capacity, high test volume
On first-time pass rate the XF 650 V beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).
KAWASAKI
ZX-6R
78.1% pass · 174k tests
SUZUKI
GSF600
77.3% pass · 143k tests
YAMAHA
FZS600
82.6% pass · 137k tests
HONDA
VFR800 FI
86.7% pass · 89.4k tests
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the XF 650 V.
Pass rate by registration year
how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date
Best year to buy used: 1998 (89.3% pass). Weakest: 1998 (89.3%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.