BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

SUZUKI SFV

645cc Petrol Class 2
88.0%
first-time pass rate
6.0%
failed outright
11,302
median miles at test
3,464
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2014–2025

The SFV's first-time pass rate has fallen 9.3 points since 2014, 96.9% to 87.6%.

82%91%100%2014: 96.9% pass (32 tests)2016: 85.0% pass (40 tests)2017: 86.7% pass (196 tests)2018: 91.5% pass (363 tests)2019: 90.8% pass (400 tests)2020: 88.9% pass (369 tests)2021: 86.3% pass (451 tests)2022: 86.4% pass (440 tests)2023: 87.6% pass (427 tests)2024: 85.3% pass (340 tests)2025: 87.6% pass (340 tests)20142025

Pass rate by mileage

how the SFV's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage SFV passes first time 94.0% of the time; by 50k that's 75.4%.

72%85%98%0k: 94.0% pass (1,559 tests)10k: 86.8% pass (859 tests)20k: 80.7% pass (481 tests)30k: 80.3% pass (294 tests)40k: 85.5% pass (138 tests)50k: 75.4% pass (61 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a SFV

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lamps and reflectors
115 31.2 1.6×
brakes
64 17.3 0.3×
suspension
48 13 1.6×
structure and attachments
40 10.8 1.3×
tyres
35 9.5 1.4×
steering
28 7.6 1.8×
tyres and wheels
15 4.1 0.2×
audible warning (Horn)
11 3 1.7×
lighting and signalling
7 1.9
steering and suspension
6 1.6

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the SFV beats 4 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the SFV.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2010 (94.5% pass). Weakest: 2009 (84.4%).

82%89%97%2009: 84.4% pass (186 tests)2010: 94.5% pass (110 tests)2011: 87.0% pass (69 tests)2013: 87.2% pass (235 tests)2014: 88.5% pass (894 tests)2015: 87.6% pass (1,623 tests)2016: 89.4% pass (303 tests)200920132016

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

SUZUKI SFV FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the SUZUKI SFV reliable?

The SUZUKI SFV is more reliable than average for its class: 88.0% of its 3,464 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #1604 of 5426 models.

What does a SFV fail its MOT on most?

lamps and reflectors — 31% of all defects recorded against failed SFV tests.

What is the best year of SFV to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2010-registered examples do best (94.5%) and 2009 worst (84.4%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a SFV last?

The median SFV shows 11,302 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 75.4% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.