BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
79.3%
first-time pass rate
15.8%
failed outright
17,456
median miles at test
697
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2011–2023

The X7 250's first-time pass rate has risen 13.1 points since 2011, 71.7% to 84.8%.

68%80%92%2011: 71.7% pass (53 tests)2012: 73.3% pass (86 tests)2013: 83.3% pass (78 tests)2014: 75.8% pass (66 tests)2015: 77.0% pass (61 tests)2016: 77.0% pass (61 tests)2017: 86.3% pass (51 tests)2018: 82.4% pass (34 tests)2019: 79.5% pass (39 tests)2020: 85.3% pass (34 tests)2021: 88.2% pass (34 tests)2022: 80.0% pass (30 tests)2023: 84.8% pass (33 tests)20112023

Pass rate by mileage

how the X7 250's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage X7 250 passes first time 88.2% of the time; by 40k that's 70.7%.

67%79%92%0k: 88.2% pass (178 tests)10k: 76.4% pass (203 tests)20k: 77.6% pass (143 tests)30k: 77.1% pass (83 tests)40k: 70.7% pass (41 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a X7 250

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
steering and suspension
73 31.5 2.4×
lighting and signalling
39 16.8 1.2×
tyres and wheels
29 12.5 1.9×
brakes
29 12.5 0.8×
suspension
16 6.9 2.5×
lamps and reflectors
15 6.5 1.1×
tyres
13 5.6 2.1×
structure and attachments
10 4.3 1.7×
fuel and exhaust
5 2.2 0.9×
steering
3 1.3 1.0×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the X7 250 beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (PIAGGIO PX 200 E, PIAGGIO X9, LAMBRETTA GP200).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the X7 250.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2010 (92.6% pass). Weakest: 2008 (77.5%).

74%85%96%2008: 77.5% pass (431 tests)2009: 79.8% pass (203 tests)2010: 92.6% pass (54 tests)200820092010

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

PIAGGIO X7 250 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the PIAGGIO X7 250 reliable?

The PIAGGIO X7 250 is less reliable than average for its class: 79.3% of its 697 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3719 of 5426 models.

What does a X7 250 fail its MOT on most?

steering and suspension — 31% of all defects recorded against failed X7 250 tests.

What is the best year of X7 250 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2010-registered examples do best (92.6%) and 2008 worst (77.5%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a X7 250 last?

The median X7 250 shows 17,456 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 70.7% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.