LEXMOTO URBAN 125 LJ 125 T-16
Pass rate over time
The URBAN 125 LJ 125 T-16's first-time pass rate has fallen 5.9 points since 2021, 68.6% to 62.7%.
What fails on a URBAN 125 LJ 125 T-16
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| lamps and reflectors |
|
75 | 31.5 |
| suspension |
|
56 | 23.5 |
| brakes |
|
28 | 11.8 |
| tyres |
|
27 | 11.3 |
| steering |
|
25 | 10.5 |
| structure and attachments |
|
16 | 6.7 |
| Identification of the vehicle |
|
5 | 2.1 |
| audible warning (Horn) |
|
5 | 2.1 |
| wheels |
|
1 | 0.4 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the URBAN 125 LJ 125 T-16 beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (PIAGGIO VESPA, HONDA PCX 125, HONDA Vision 110).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the URBAN 125 LJ 125 T-16.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2019 (71.0% pass). Weakest: 2018 (69.7%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.