BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

KTM LC4

640cc Petrol Class 2
#3787 of 5426 overall #172 of 230 KTMs #2404 of 2787 other bikes
78.9%
first-time pass rate
10.7%
failed outright
8,272
median miles at test
940
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2021

The LC4's first-time pass rate has fallen 19.3 points since 2006, 92.6% to 73.3%.

59%79%99%2006: 92.6% pass (81 tests)2007: 88.2% pass (68 tests)2008: 80.6% pass (62 tests)2009: 66.1% pass (59 tests)2010: 78.3% pass (69 tests)2011: 67.7% pass (65 tests)2012: 76.3% pass (59 tests)2013: 71.7% pass (60 tests)2014: 72.6% pass (62 tests)2015: 83.9% pass (56 tests)2016: 80.5% pass (41 tests)2017: 72.5% pass (40 tests)2018: 80.0% pass (35 tests)2021: 73.3% pass (30 tests)20062021

Pass rate by mileage

how the LC4's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage LC4 passes first time 80.8% of the time; by 20k that's 78.1%.

75%78%82%0k: 80.8% pass (536 tests)10k: 75.7% pass (263 tests)20k: 78.1% pass (73 tests)0k10k20k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a LC4

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
103 41.4 1.6×
reg plates and vin
36 14.5 5.0×
steering and suspension
34 13.7 1.0×
tyres and wheels
19 7.6 0.9×
brakes
16 6.4 0.3×
fuel and exhaust
13 5.2 1.7×
drive system
11 4.4 1.3×
lamps and reflectors
7 2.8 0.4×
body and structure
6 2.4 1.3×
structure and attachments
4 1.6 0.5×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the LC4 beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the LC4.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2007 (86.1% pass). Weakest: 2001 (77.0%).

75%82%88%2000: 78.0% pass (100 tests)2001: 77.0% pass (139 tests)2002: 79.4% pass (252 tests)2003: 82.5% pass (143 tests)2007: 86.1% pass (79 tests)200020022007

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KTM LC4 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KTM LC4 reliable?

The KTM LC4 is less reliable than average for its class: 78.9% of its 940 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3787 of 5426 models.

What does a LC4 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 41% of all defects recorded against failed LC4 tests.

What is the best year of LC4 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2007-registered examples do best (86.1%) and 2001 worst (77.0%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a LC4 last?

The median LC4 shows 8,272 miles at test, and examples around 20k miles still pass 78.1% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.