BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

KAWASAKI KMX200

198cc Petrol Class 1
76.8%
first-time pass rate
14.0%
failed outright
15,798
median miles at test
2,665
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2025

The KMX200's first-time pass rate has risen 8.9 points since 2005, 75.4% to 84.3%.

62%78%93%2005: 75.4% pass (57 tests)2006: 72.5% pass (207 tests)2007: 73.1% pass (175 tests)2008: 74.2% pass (186 tests)2009: 71.1% pass (180 tests)2010: 67.5% pass (166 tests)2011: 73.5% pass (155 tests)2012: 73.0% pass (163 tests)2013: 74.8% pass (143 tests)2014: 80.7% pass (150 tests)2015: 76.9% pass (130 tests)2016: 82.6% pass (109 tests)2017: 85.3% pass (116 tests)2018: 72.5% pass (80 tests)2019: 81.9% pass (83 tests)2020: 82.7% pass (98 tests)2021: 78.7% pass (108 tests)2022: 81.8% pass (99 tests)2023: 86.1% pass (101 tests)2024: 88.2% pass (76 tests)2025: 84.3% pass (83 tests)20052025

Pass rate by mileage

how the KMX200's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage KMX200 passes first time 78.0% of the time; by 30k that's 75.5%.

74%77%79%0k: 78.0% pass (678 tests)10k: 77.4% pass (1,164 tests)20k: 75.0% pass (671 tests)30k: 75.5% pass (110 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a KMX200

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
336 30.5 1.6×
brakes
209 19 1.2×
steering and suspension
195 17.7 1.7×
tyres and wheels
104 9.4 1.4×
lamps and reflectors
73 6.6 0.8×
drive system
71 6.4 2.5×
fuel and exhaust
34 3.1 1.5×
reg plates and vin
33 3 1.9×
tyres
26 2.4 1.1×
body and structure
21 1.9 1.3×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the KMX200 beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YP250, YAMAHA WR250F, HONDA XR250).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the KMX200.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1992 (82.7% pass). Weakest: 1988 (72.7%).

71%78%85%1988: 72.7% pass (502 tests)1989: 76.8% pass (641 tests)1990: 78.1% pass (622 tests)1991: 73.4% pass (425 tests)1992: 82.7% pass (289 tests)1994: 79.2% pass (53 tests)198819911994

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KAWASAKI KMX200 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KAWASAKI KMX200 reliable?

The KAWASAKI KMX200 is more reliable than average for its class: 76.8% of its 2,665 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #4087 of 5426 models.

What does a KMX200 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 30% of all defects recorded against failed KMX200 tests.

What is the best year of KMX200 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1992-registered examples do best (82.7%) and 1988 worst (72.7%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a KMX200 last?

The median KMX200 shows 15,798 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 75.5% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.