Model report · 2005–2025
KAWASAKI KL650 - C4
651cc
Petrol
Class 2
82.9%
first-time pass rate
13.7%
failed outright
15,703
median miles at test
117
MOT tests, 2005–2025
What fails on a KL650 - C4
failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| brakes |
|
13 | 39.4 |
| lighting and signalling |
|
8 | 24.2 |
| tyres and wheels |
|
3 | 9.1 |
| drive system |
|
3 | 9.1 |
| steering and suspension |
|
2 | 6.1 |
| wheels |
|
1 | 3 |
| body and structure |
|
1 | 3 |
| suspension |
|
1 | 3 |
| Items Not Tested |
|
1 | 3 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
same type, similar capacity, high test volume
On first-time pass rate the KL650 - C4 beats 3 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).
KAWASAKI
ZX-6R
78.1% pass · 174k tests
SUZUKI
GSF600
77.3% pass · 143k tests
YAMAHA
FZS600
82.6% pass · 137k tests
HONDA
VFR800 FI
86.7% pass · 89.4k tests
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the KL650 - C4.
Pass rate by registration year
how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date
Best year to buy used: 1998 (88.9% pass). Weakest: 1999 (75.9%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.