BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

KAWASAKI ER650

649cc Petrol Class 2
80.9%
first-time pass rate
10.2%
failed outright
13,453
median miles at test
837
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2011–2025

The ER650's first-time pass rate has held steady since 2011 (87.2% → 87.1%).

66%82%98%2011: 87.2% pass (39 tests)2012: 92.3% pass (52 tests)2013: 82.5% pass (57 tests)2014: 88.1% pass (67 tests)2015: 75.3% pass (85 tests)2016: 75.6% pass (78 tests)2017: 79.2% pass (72 tests)2018: 81.8% pass (44 tests)2019: 86.5% pass (52 tests)2020: 84.1% pass (44 tests)2021: 71.4% pass (49 tests)2022: 72.5% pass (51 tests)2023: 79.5% pass (44 tests)2024: 81.8% pass (33 tests)2025: 87.1% pass (31 tests)20112025

Pass rate by mileage

how the ER650's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage ER650 passes first time 90.3% of the time; by 30k that's 73.6%.

70%82%94%0k: 90.3% pass (288 tests)10k: 79.1% pass (278 tests)20k: 75.3% pass (150 tests)30k: 73.6% pass (72 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a ER650

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lamps and reflectors
31 22 1.6×
lighting and signalling
23 16.3 0.4×
brakes
21 14.9 0.5×
tyres
11 7.8 1.7×
tyres and wheels
11 7.8 0.7×
steering and suspension
11 7.8 0.4×
suspension
9 6.4 1.3×
structure and attachments
9 6.4 1.6×
drive system
8 5.7 1.3×
steering
7 5 2.0×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the ER650 beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the ER650.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2010 (86.3% pass). Weakest: 2012 (73.0%).

70%80%89%2006: 84.4% pass (135 tests)2007: 74.6% pass (114 tests)2008: 79.1% pass (163 tests)2009: 81.5% pass (146 tests)2010: 86.3% pass (95 tests)2011: 84.8% pass (92 tests)2012: 73.0% pass (74 tests)200620092012

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KAWASAKI ER650 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KAWASAKI ER650 reliable?

The KAWASAKI ER650 is less reliable than average for its class: 80.9% of its 837 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3399 of 5426 models.

What does a ER650 fail its MOT on most?

lamps and reflectors — 22% of all defects recorded against failed ER650 tests.

What is the best year of ER650 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2010-registered examples do best (86.3%) and 2012 worst (73.0%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a ER650 last?

The median ER650 shows 13,453 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 73.6% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.