BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ KAWASAKI/ER 650 C9F
Model report · 2005–2025

KAWASAKI ER 650 C9F

649cc Petrol Class 2
84.3%
first-time pass rate
8.7%
failed outright
12,057
median miles at test
2,302
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2012–2025

The ER 650 C9F's first-time pass rate has risen 1.8 points since 2012, 86.4% to 88.2%.

78%84%90%2012: 86.4% pass (177 tests)2013: 86.1% pass (245 tests)2014: 85.2% pass (244 tests)2015: 84.3% pass (230 tests)2016: 83.1% pass (219 tests)2017: 85.7% pass (210 tests)2018: 82.1% pass (145 tests)2019: 82.2% pass (135 tests)2020: 82.9% pass (117 tests)2021: 83.2% pass (137 tests)2022: 80.0% pass (140 tests)2023: 84.0% pass (119 tests)2024: 85.4% pass (89 tests)2025: 88.2% pass (93 tests)20122025

Pass rate by mileage

how the ER 650 C9F's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage ER 650 C9F passes first time 89.4% of the time; by 40k that's 74.5%.

72%82%92%0k: 89.4% pass (992 tests)10k: 81.7% pass (712 tests)20k: 81.1% pass (333 tests)30k: 76.6% pass (184 tests)40k: 74.5% pass (51 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a ER 650 C9F

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
brakes
86 23.5 0.6×
lighting and signalling
54 14.8 0.4×
lamps and reflectors
53 14.5 1.0×
tyres and wheels
48 13.1 0.9×
steering and suspension
30 8.2 0.4×
structure and attachments
28 7.7 1.2×
tyres
24 6.6 1.3×
drive system
18 4.9 0.8×
suspension
14 3.8 0.8×
steering
11 3 1.0×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the ER 650 C9F beats 3 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the ER 650 C9F.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2009 (84.8% pass). Weakest: 2011 (78.4%).

77%82%86%2009: 84.8% pass (1,728 tests)2010: 83.4% pass (489 tests)2011: 78.4% pass (74 tests)200920102011

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KAWASAKI ER 650 C9F FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KAWASAKI ER 650 C9F reliable?

The KAWASAKI ER 650 C9F is about average for its class: 84.3% of its 2,302 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #2658 of 5426 models.

What does a ER 650 C9F fail its MOT on most?

brakes — 23% of all defects recorded against failed ER 650 C9F tests.

What is the best year of ER 650 C9F to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2009-registered examples do best (84.8%) and 2011 worst (78.4%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a ER 650 C9F last?

The median ER 650 C9F shows 12,057 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 74.5% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.