BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ KAWASAKI/ER 650 A7F
Model report · 2005–2025

KAWASAKI ER 650 A7F

649cc Petrol Class 2
81.3%
first-time pass rate
10.0%
failed outright
15,051
median miles at test
2,479
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2010–2025

The ER 650 A7F's first-time pass rate has fallen 2.6 points since 2010, 85.9% to 83.3%.

72%81%89%2010: 85.9% pass (149 tests)2011: 82.3% pass (248 tests)2012: 83.6% pass (220 tests)2013: 84.6% pass (214 tests)2014: 81.2% pass (202 tests)2015: 80.9% pass (194 tests)2016: 84.0% pass (188 tests)2017: 75.1% pass (177 tests)2018: 80.7% pass (114 tests)2019: 77.8% pass (126 tests)2020: 77.4% pass (106 tests)2021: 82.9% pass (123 tests)2022: 79.2% pass (125 tests)2023: 78.8% pass (118 tests)2024: 76.8% pass (82 tests)2025: 83.3% pass (90 tests)20102025

Pass rate by mileage

how the ER 650 A7F's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage ER 650 A7F passes first time 89.4% of the time; by 50k that's 64.7%.

60%77%94%0k: 89.4% pass (809 tests)10k: 78.9% pass (759 tests)20k: 78.6% pass (430 tests)30k: 74.7% pass (241 tests)40k: 76.1% pass (117 tests)50k: 64.7% pass (51 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a ER 650 A7F

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
105 20 0.7×
brakes
101 19.3 0.7×
lamps and reflectors
74 14.1 1.2×
steering and suspension
62 11.8 0.6×
tyres and wheels
61 11.6 1.1×
structure and attachments
38 7.3 1.8×
drive system
24 4.6 0.8×
suspension
23 4.4 0.9×
tyres
23 4.4 1.4×
reg plates and vin
13 2.5 0.7×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the ER 650 A7F beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the ER 650 A7F.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2006 (91.3% pass). Weakest: 2007 (80.3%).

78%86%94%2006: 91.3% pass (69 tests)2007: 80.3% pass (1,599 tests)2008: 81.9% pass (785 tests)200620072008

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KAWASAKI ER 650 A7F FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KAWASAKI ER 650 A7F reliable?

The KAWASAKI ER 650 A7F is less reliable than average for its class: 81.3% of its 2,479 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3318 of 5426 models.

What does a ER 650 A7F fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 20% of all defects recorded against failed ER 650 A7F tests.

What is the best year of ER 650 A7F to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2006-registered examples do best (91.3%) and 2007 worst (80.3%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a ER 650 A7F last?

The median ER 650 A7F shows 15,051 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 64.7% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.