The pass rate is the MOT first-time pass: a roadworthiness check of the items an MOT covers (brakes, lights, tyres, steering, structure, emissions), not a full mechanical inspection of engine or gearbox internals. It is a reliability signal, not a complete measure of mechanical reliability. What this measures.
“vs expected” adjusts for age, mileage and test class, so a cherished classic and a hard-used commuter are compared fairly. How this works.
Pass rate over time
The FE's first-time pass rate has risen 18.6 points since 2017, 71.4% to 90.0%.
What fails on a FE
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| lighting and signalling |
|
28 | 26.7 |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
25 | 23.8 |
| suspension |
|
11 | 10.5 |
| reg plates and vin |
|
9 | 8.6 |
| Identification of the vehicle |
|
9 | 8.6 |
| steering and suspension |
|
6 | 5.7 |
| tyres and wheels |
|
6 | 5.7 |
| brakes |
|
5 | 4.8 |
| audible warning (Horn) |
|
5 | 4.8 |
| wheels |
|
1 | 1 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the FE beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ER5, SUZUKI GS500, SUZUKI AN400).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the FE.
Compare with any bike
More HUSABERG models
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2013 (79.9% pass). Weakest: 2014 (78.8%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.
Embed this bike
Free to embed on your site, blog or forum — a live Husaberg Fe reliability card that stays up to date and links back here. More on the free API page.