HONDA CBF600 HORNET
What fails on a CBF600 HORNET
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| lighting and signalling |
|
12 | 24.5 |
| brakes |
|
10 | 20.4 |
| steering and suspension |
|
8 | 16.3 |
| tyres and wheels |
|
5 | 10.2 |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
4 | 8.2 |
| Identification of the vehicle |
|
2 | 4.1 |
| fuel and exhaust |
|
2 | 4.1 |
| driving controls |
|
2 | 4.1 |
| suspension |
|
2 | 4.1 |
| tyres |
|
2 | 4.1 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the CBF600 HORNET beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (HONDA CB500, TRIUMPH STREET TRIPLE, HONDA CB600 HORNET).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the CBF600 HORNET.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 1998 (67.2% pass). Weakest: 1998 (67.2%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.