BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
77.5%
first-time pass rate
12.7%
failed outright
30,448
median miles at test
5,366
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2024

The CB400N's first-time pass rate has risen 15.9 points since 2005, 70.1% to 86.0%.

65%80%94%2005: 70.1% pass (117 tests)2006: 79.8% pass (525 tests)2007: 75.8% pass (479 tests)2008: 72.3% pass (400 tests)2009: 72.9% pass (395 tests)2010: 71.9% pass (342 tests)2011: 75.8% pass (347 tests)2012: 74.7% pass (316 tests)2013: 76.8% pass (310 tests)2014: 78.3% pass (318 tests)2015: 78.1% pass (297 tests)2016: 78.6% pass (276 tests)2017: 85.2% pass (277 tests)2018: 80.5% pass (215 tests)2019: 81.3% pass (192 tests)2020: 85.8% pass (134 tests)2021: 83.3% pass (162 tests)2022: 80.9% pass (110 tests)2023: 89.0% pass (82 tests)2024: 86.0% pass (43 tests)20052024

Pass rate by mileage

how the CB400N's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage CB400N passes first time 78.4% of the time; by 50k that's 73.6%.

72%77%83%0k: 78.4% pass (463 tests)10k: 81.1% pass (917 tests)20k: 79.2% pass (1,233 tests)30k: 75.8% pass (1,292 tests)40k: 75.0% pass (755 tests)50k: 73.6% pass (390 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a CB400N

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
429 25.4 1.3×
steering and suspension
406 24 1.7×
brakes
329 19.5 1.0×
drive system
163 9.6 3.1×
tyres and wheels
141 8.3 1.2×
fuel and exhaust
61 3.6 1.3×
lamps and reflectors
55 3.3 0.4×
body and structure
47 2.8 1.4×
driving controls
34 2 2.6×
suspension
25 1.5 0.4×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the CB400N beats 0 of its 2 closest rivals (HONDA CB500, HONDA CB400).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the CB400N.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1977 (83.9% pass). Weakest: 1995 (72.7%).

70%78%86%1976: 83.8% pass (80 tests)1977: 83.9% pass (149 tests)1978: 76.7% pass (395 tests)1979: 77.7% pass (561 tests)1980: 77.8% pass (1,080 tests)1981: 76.3% pass (691 tests)1982: 74.4% pass (593 tests)1983: 80.1% pass (619 tests)1984: 78.6% pass (374 tests)1985: 73.6% pass (87 tests)1989: 77.1% pass (70 tests)1992: 78.1% pass (64 tests)1993: 83.7% pass (98 tests)1994: 75.0% pass (68 tests)1995: 72.7% pass (66 tests)197619831995

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HONDA CB400N FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HONDA CB400N reliable?

The HONDA CB400N is less reliable than average for its class: 77.5% of its 5,366 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3975 of 5426 models.

What does a CB400N fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 25% of all defects recorded against failed CB400N tests.

What is the best year of CB400N to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1977-registered examples do best (83.9%) and 1995 worst (72.7%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a CB400N last?

The median CB400N shows 30,448 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 73.6% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.