BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ HONDA/CB250 N
Model report · 2005–2025
76.2%
first-time pass rate
14.3%
failed outright
27,731
median miles at test
9,530
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2025

The CB250 N's first-time pass rate has risen 13.8 points since 2005, 72.7% to 86.5%.

67%82%98%2005: 72.7% pass (256 tests)2006: 76.1% pass (1,043 tests)2007: 72.8% pass (860 tests)2008: 71.8% pass (795 tests)2009: 73.6% pass (739 tests)2010: 75.5% pass (678 tests)2011: 75.8% pass (656 tests)2012: 72.2% pass (622 tests)2013: 74.4% pass (586 tests)2014: 75.9% pass (553 tests)2015: 78.5% pass (507 tests)2016: 82.8% pass (466 tests)2017: 79.5% pass (419 tests)2018: 80.2% pass (334 tests)2019: 80.3% pass (300 tests)2020: 79.0% pass (214 tests)2021: 81.8% pass (203 tests)2022: 90.9% pass (143 tests)2023: 83.3% pass (78 tests)2024: 92.7% pass (41 tests)2025: 86.5% pass (37 tests)20052025

Pass rate by mileage

how the CB250 N's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage CB250 N passes first time 79.9% of the time; by 50k that's 73.9%.

73%77%81%0k: 79.9% pass (821 tests)10k: 79.3% pass (1,892 tests)20k: 75.4% pass (2,665 tests)30k: 74.6% pass (2,076 tests)40k: 73.8% pass (1,082 tests)50k: 73.9% pass (491 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a CB250 N

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
979 27.8 1.5×
steering and suspension
919 26.1 2.3×
brakes
562 16 1.1×
drive system
306 8.7 3.2×
tyres and wheels
301 8.5 1.4×
body and structure
131 3.7 2.3×
fuel and exhaust
122 3.5 1.5×
lamps and reflectors
84 2.4 0.3×
driving controls
70 2 3.1×
reg plates and vin
49 1.4 0.8×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the CB250 N beats 0 of its 1 closest rivals (HONDA CB250).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the CB250 N.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1983 (80.4% pass). Weakest: 1979 (74.8%).

74%78%82%1978: 76.1% pass (519 tests)1979: 74.8% pass (1,859 tests)1980: 76.5% pass (2,449 tests)1981: 74.9% pass (2,108 tests)1982: 77.8% pass (2,045 tests)1983: 80.4% pass (336 tests)197819811983

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HONDA CB250 N FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HONDA CB250 N reliable?

The HONDA CB250 N is less reliable than average for its class: 76.2% of its 9,530 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #4160 of 5426 models.

What does a CB250 N fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 28% of all defects recorded against failed CB250 N tests.

What is the best year of CB250 N to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1983-registered examples do best (80.4%) and 1979 worst (74.8%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a CB250 N last?

The median CB250 N shows 27,731 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 73.9% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.