DUCATI MONSTER 696
What fails on a MONSTER 696
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| tyres and wheels |
|
6 | 23.1 |
| lighting and signalling |
|
5 | 19.2 |
| brakes |
|
5 | 19.2 |
| steering and suspension |
|
3 | 11.5 |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
3 | 11.5 |
| reg plates and vin |
|
1 | 3.8 |
| steering |
|
1 | 3.8 |
| suspension |
|
1 | 3.8 |
| tyres |
|
1 | 3.8 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the MONSTER 696 beats 4 of its 4 closest rivals (HONDA CB500, TRIUMPH STREET TRIPLE, HONDA CB600 HORNET).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the MONSTER 696.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2009 (94.4% pass). Weakest: 2008 (85.0%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.