BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
92.8%
first-time pass rate
3.0%
failed outright
15,191
median miles at test
1,122
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2017

The LEADER's first-time pass rate has risen 3.4 points since 2006, 90.1% to 93.5%.

87%93%99%2006: 90.1% pass (101 tests)2007: 93.1% pass (102 tests)2008: 90.6% pass (96 tests)2009: 89.4% pass (104 tests)2010: 94.4% pass (90 tests)2011: 92.4% pass (92 tests)2012: 94.6% pass (92 tests)2013: 92.9% pass (84 tests)2014: 91.1% pass (90 tests)2015: 93.9% pass (82 tests)2016: 97.1% pass (68 tests)2017: 93.5% pass (62 tests)20062017

Pass rate by mileage

how the LEADER's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage LEADER passes first time 93.2% of the time; by 50k that's 92.7%.

87%93%99%0k: 93.2% pass (426 tests)10k: 91.7% pass (216 tests)20k: 92.1% pass (139 tests)30k: 88.3% pass (103 tests)40k: 97.2% pass (106 tests)50k: 92.7% pass (41 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a LEADER

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
23 30.7 0.2×
brakes
20 26.7 0.3×
steering and suspension
17 22.7 0.4×
tyres and wheels
6 8 0.3×
fuel and exhaust
4 5.3 0.4×
drive system
3 4 0.2×
Items Not Tested
1 1.3 1.0×
body and structure
1 1.3 0.2×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the LEADER beats 4 of its 4 closest rivals (PIAGGIO PX 200 E, PIAGGIO X9, LAMBRETTA GP200).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the LEADER.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1963 (96.2% pass). Weakest: 1971 (87.5%).

86%92%98%1959: 92.7% pass (164 tests)1960: 93.7% pass (207 tests)1961: 93.6% pass (202 tests)1962: 93.8% pass (177 tests)1963: 96.2% pass (78 tests)1964: 92.7% pass (96 tests)1965: 87.7% pass (81 tests)1971: 87.5% pass (64 tests)195919631971

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

ARIEL LEADER FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the ARIEL LEADER reliable?

The ARIEL LEADER is more reliable than average for its class: 92.8% of its 1,122 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #330 of 5426 models.

What does a LEADER fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 31% of all defects recorded against failed LEADER tests.

What is the best year of LEADER to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1963-registered examples do best (96.2%) and 1971 worst (87.5%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a LEADER last?

The median LEADER shows 15,191 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 92.7% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.