BIKERELIABILITY Reg check
League table/ TGB 304/vs Gilera Runner
Head-to-head · 2005–2025

Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025

TGB 304 vs Gilera Runner

The Gilera Runner passes its MOT first time more often than the TGB 304: 70.8% vs 70.2%, a 0.6-point lead.

MOT reliability, side by side

first-time pass rate, outright fail rate and tests analysed · 2005–2025
Metric TGB 304 Gilera Runner
First-time pass rate 70.2% 70.8%
Outright fail rate 20.0% 21.5%
Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) -0.2 pts -0.7 pts
Engine size 124cc 124cc
Rank among all models #4717 of 5428 #4675 of 5428
Median miles at test 11,781 11,381
MOT tests analysed 1,243 69,850
Most common failure steering and suspension lighting and signalling

First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.

"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.

What fails, side by side

share of each bike's MOT tests that failed on the component · lower is better
Component TGB 304 Gilera Runner
Lights & signalling 7.7% 12.3%
Steering & suspension 8.7% 10.6%
Brakes 7.6% 7.2%
Tyres & wheels 5.6% 5.1%
Fuel & exhaust 2.1% 2.6%
Structure & body 1.4% 2.0%

A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.

Pass rate by test year

first-time MOT pass rate in each calendar year both bikes were tested
Test year TGB 304 Gilera Runner
2010 73.6% 67.9%
2011 75.2% 67.6%
2012 74.2% 69.5%
2013 68.6% 69.5%
2014 63.4% 70.6%
2015 70.0% 72.1%
2016 67.7% 73.3%
2017 68.9% 76.1%

Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.

Pass rate by mileage

first-time MOT pass rate by miles on the clock at test
Mileage TGB 304 Gilera Runner
0k-10k miles 75.0% 76.2%
10k-20k miles 67.7% 67.5%
20k-30k miles 65.7% 65.4%

Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.

TGB 304 vs Gilera Runner FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Which is more reliable, the TGB 304 or the Gilera Runner?

The Gilera Runner passes its MOT first time more often than the TGB 304: 70.8% vs 70.2%, a 0.6-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class the two are level (-0.2 vs -0.7 points against comparable bikes), so the raw gap is mostly down to how old and how used each fleet is. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.

What does the TGB 304 fail its MOT on most?

Steering & suspension: 8.7% of TGB 304 MOT tests failed on it, then lights & signalling (7.7%).

What does the Gilera Runner fail its MOT on most?

Lights & signalling: 12.3% of Gilera Runner MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (10.6%).

Which holds up better at high mileage, the TGB 304 or the Gilera Runner?

They are level: at 20k-30k miles the TGB 304 passes 65.7% first time and the Gilera Runner 65.4%.

See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.