Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 E5 vs Suzuki GSF600

The Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 E5 passes its MOT first time more often than the Suzuki GSF600: 89.4% vs 77.3%, a 12.1-point lead.

MOT reliability, side by side

first-time pass rate, outright fail rate and tests analysed · 2005–2025

Metric	Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 E5	Suzuki GSF600
First-time pass rate	89.4%	77.3%
Outright fail rate	5.3%	14.2%
Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted)	-0.5 pts	-6.1 pts
Engine size	648cc	599cc
Rank among all models	#1147 of 5428	#4013 of 5428
Median miles at test	2,939	21,080
MOT tests analysed	471	143,023
Most common failure	lamps and reflectors	brakes

First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.

"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.

Pass rate by mileage

first-time MOT pass rate by miles on the clock at test

Mileage	Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 E5	Suzuki GSF600
0k-10k miles	89.4%	86.8%
10k-20k miles	90.0%	80.1%

Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.

ROYAL ENFIELD CONTINENTAL GT 650 E5 89.4% pass · 471 tests SUZUKI GSF600 77.3% pass · 143k tests

See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.