Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Norton Comando vs Kawasaki ZX-6R
The Norton Comando passes its MOT first time more often than the Kawasaki ZX-6R: 92.6% vs 78.1%, a 14.5-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Norton Comando | Kawasaki ZX-6R |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 92.6% | 78.1% |
| Outright fail rate | 3.1% | 14.0% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | +8.5 pts | -5.8 pts |
| Engine size | 750cc | 599cc |
| Rank among all models | #367 of 5428 | #3895 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 20,686 | 19,446 |
| MOT tests analysed | 1,012 | 173,956 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | lighting and signalling |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
What fails, side by side
| Component | Norton Comando | Kawasaki ZX-6R |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & signalling | 1.7% | 6.1% |
| Brakes | 1.2% | 5.2% |
| Steering & suspension | 0.3% | 4.6% |
| Tyres & wheels | 0.3% | 3.6% |
| Drive system | 0.4% | 1.0% |
| Structure & body | 0% | 1.2% |
| Fuel & exhaust | 0% | 0.8% |
A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.
Pass rate by test year
| Test year | Norton Comando | Kawasaki ZX-6R |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 92.0% | 76.3% |
| 2011 | 88.3% | 76.6% |
| 2012 | 90.7% | 75.4% |
| 2013 | 89.7% | 75.5% |
| 2014 | 97.4% | 76.4% |
| 2015 | 93.9% | 76.7% |
| 2016 | 90.1% | 77.7% |
| 2017 | 92.1% | 77.1% |
Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Norton Comando | Kawasaki ZX-6R |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 91.4% | 86.1% |
| 10k-20k miles | 96.1% | 80.6% |
| 20k-30k miles | 90.4% | 75.4% |
| 30k-40k miles | 92.4% | 71.8% |
| 40k-50k miles | 93.8% | 69.5% |
| 50k-60k miles | 93.4% | 69.0% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
Norton Comando vs Kawasaki ZX-6R FAQ
Which is more reliable, the Norton Comando or the Kawasaki ZX-6R?
The Norton Comando passes its MOT first time more often than the Kawasaki ZX-6R: 92.6% vs 78.1%, a 14.5-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class, the Norton Comando still comes out ahead: +8.5 points vs comparable bikes for the Norton Comando, -5.8 for the Kawasaki ZX-6R. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.
What does the Norton Comando fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 1.7% of Norton Comando MOT tests failed on it, then brakes (1.2%).
What does the Kawasaki ZX-6R fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 6.1% of Kawasaki ZX-6R MOT tests failed on it, then brakes (5.2%).
Which holds up better at high mileage, the Norton Comando or the Kawasaki ZX-6R?
At 50k-60k miles the Norton Comando passes first time more often: 93.4% for the Norton Comando vs 69.0% for the Kawasaki ZX-6R.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.