Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Norton 16H vs Suzuki SV650S
The Norton 16H passes its MOT first time more often than the Suzuki SV650S: 93.3% vs 80.6%, a 12.7-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Norton 16H | Suzuki SV650S |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 93.3% | 80.6% |
| Outright fail rate | 2.0% | 11.9% |
| Engine size | 498cc | 645cc |
| Rank among all models | #252 of 5428 | #3459 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 7,073 | 16,958 |
| MOT tests analysed | 688 | 84,632 |
| Most common failure | steering and suspension | lighting and signalling |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
What fails, side by side
| Component | Norton 16H | Suzuki SV650S |
|---|---|---|
| Brakes | 1.0% | 4.7% |
| Lights & signalling | 0.1% | 5.0% |
| Steering & suspension | 0.9% | 2.5% |
| Tyres & wheels | 0.3% | 3.0% |
| Structure & body | 0.4% | 0.9% |
| Drive system | 0% | 1.2% |
| Fuel & exhaust | 0% | 0.8% |
A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.
Pass rate by test year
| Test year | Norton 16H | Suzuki SV650S |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 93.2% | 85.9% |
| 2007 | 98.8% | 85.5% |
| 2008 | 95.6% | 82.8% |
| 2009 | 94.3% | 80.5% |
| 2010 | 90.6% | 80.3% |
| 2011 | 94.2% | 80.0% |
| 2012 | 91.5% | 78.8% |
Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Norton 16H | Suzuki SV650S |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 90.7% | 88.2% |
| 10k-20k miles | 96.0% | 81.6% |
| 20k-30k miles | 95.7% | 76.9% |
| 30k-40k miles | 97.1% | 73.6% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
Norton 16H vs Suzuki SV650S FAQ
Which is more reliable, the Norton 16H or the Suzuki SV650S?
The Norton 16H passes its MOT first time more often than the Suzuki SV650S: 93.3% vs 80.6%, a 12.7-point lead. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.
What does the Norton 16H fail its MOT on most?
Brakes: 1.0% of Norton 16H MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (0.9%).
What does the Suzuki SV650S fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 5.0% of Suzuki SV650S MOT tests failed on it, then brakes (4.7%).
Which holds up better at high mileage, the Norton 16H or the Suzuki SV650S?
At 30k-40k miles the Norton 16H passes first time more often: 97.1% for the Norton 16H vs 73.6% for the Suzuki SV650S.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.