BIKERELIABILITY Reg check
League table/ MZ Saxon/vs Honda XR250
Head-to-head · 2005–2025

Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025

MZ Saxon vs Honda XR250

The MZ Saxon passes its MOT first time more often than the Honda XR250: 84.7% vs 78.8%, a 5.9-point lead.

MOT reliability, side by side

first-time pass rate, outright fail rate and tests analysed · 2005–2025
Metric MZ Saxon Honda XR250
First-time pass rate 84.7% 78.8%
Outright fail rate 6.3% 12.3%
Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) +6.0 pts -6.8 pts
Engine size 291cc 249cc
Rank among all models #2572 of 5428 #3805 of 5428
Median miles at test 36,407 8,618
MOT tests analysed 601 9,277
Most common failure lighting and signalling lighting and signalling

First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.

"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.

What fails, side by side

share of each bike's MOT tests that failed on the component · lower is better
Component MZ Saxon Honda XR250
Lights & signalling 3.3% 7.1%
Steering & suspension 1.7% 4.8%
Brakes 2.2% 3.8%
Tyres & wheels 1.8% 3.0%
Structure & body 1.0% 0.8%
Fuel & exhaust 0.5% 0.5%
Drive system 0% 0.8%

A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.

Pass rate by test year

first-time MOT pass rate in each calendar year both bikes were tested
Test year MZ Saxon Honda XR250
2008 74.1% 78.3%
2009 80.8% 76.5%
2010 81.3% 74.8%
2011 80.0% 74.6%
2012 86.1% 77.6%
2013 90.9% 75.4%
2014 90.0% 77.8%
2015 90.0% 80.5%

Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.

Pass rate by mileage

first-time MOT pass rate by miles on the clock at test
Mileage MZ Saxon Honda XR250
0k-10k miles 89.5% 79.5%
10k-20k miles 82.3% 78.9%
20k-30k miles 88.6% 78.3%
30k-40k miles 86.7% 77.7%
40k-50k miles 77.6% 74.1%
50k-60k miles 80.3% 83.3%

Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.

MZ Saxon vs Honda XR250 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Which is more reliable, the MZ Saxon or the Honda XR250?

The MZ Saxon passes its MOT first time more often than the Honda XR250: 84.7% vs 78.8%, a 5.9-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class, the MZ Saxon still comes out ahead: +6.0 points vs comparable bikes for the MZ Saxon, -6.8 for the Honda XR250. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.

What does the MZ Saxon fail its MOT on most?

Lights & signalling: 3.3% of MZ Saxon MOT tests failed on it, then brakes (2.2%).

What does the Honda XR250 fail its MOT on most?

Lights & signalling: 7.1% of Honda XR250 MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (4.8%).

Which holds up better at high mileage, the MZ Saxon or the Honda XR250?

At 50k-60k miles the Honda XR250 passes first time more often: 80.3% for the MZ Saxon vs 83.3% for the Honda XR250.

See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.