Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Moto Guzzi Mille vs Triumph Sprint
The Triumph Sprint passes its MOT first time more often than the Moto Guzzi Mille: 85.6% vs 77.0%, a 8.6-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Moto Guzzi Mille | Triumph Sprint |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 77.0% | 85.6% |
| Outright fail rate | 13.8% | 8.8% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | -4.9 pts | +1.8 pts |
| Engine size | 949cc | 955cc |
| Rank among all models | #4065 of 5428 | #2333 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 34,948 | 20,615 |
| MOT tests analysed | 318 | 132,827 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | brakes |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Moto Guzzi Mille | Triumph Sprint |
|---|---|---|
| 10k-20k miles | 83.3% | 87.5% |
| 20k-30k miles | 75.3% | 85.0% |
| 30k-40k miles | 78.3% | 82.1% |
| 40k-50k miles | 77.3% | 80.3% |
| 50k-60k miles | 69.7% | 79.3% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.