Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Hyosung RT125 vs Honda CBF125
The Honda CBF125 passes its MOT first time more often than the Hyosung RT125: 73.3% vs 58.6%, a 14.7-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Hyosung RT125 | Honda CBF125 |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 58.6% | 73.3% |
| Outright fail rate | 28.3% | 16.5% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | -16.7 pts | +1.1 pts |
| Engine size | 124cc | 125cc |
| Rank among all models | #5256 of 5428 | #4471 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 6,371 | 10,974 |
| MOT tests analysed | 244 | 84,425 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | brakes |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Hyosung RT125 | Honda CBF125 |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 57.8% | 80.3% |
| 10k-20k miles | 60.0% | 68.7% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.