Hyosung GV250 vs Yamaha WR250F

The Hyosung GV250 passes its MOT first time more often than the Yamaha WR250F: 78.3% vs 78.0%, a 0.3-point lead.

MOT reliability, side by side

first-time pass rate, outright fail rate and tests analysed · 2005–2025

Metric	Hyosung GV250	Yamaha WR250F
First-time pass rate	78.3%	78.0%
Outright fail rate	12.7%	12.8%
Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted)	-8.2 pts	-10.7 pts
Engine size	248cc	249cc
Rank among all models	#3872 of 5428	#3913 of 5428
Median miles at test	8,978	3,018
MOT tests analysed	1,404	10,465
Most common failure	lighting and signalling	lighting and signalling

First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.

"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.

What fails, side by side

share of each bike's MOT tests that failed on the component · lower is better

Component	Hyosung GV250	Yamaha WR250F
Lights & signalling	6.9%	8.2%
Steering & suspension	2.1%	5.1%
Brakes	4.2%	2.2%
Tyres & wheels	2.5%	3.0%
Drive system	2.1%	0.7%
Structure & body	1.2%	0.5%
Fuel & exhaust	1.0%	0.4%

A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.

Pass rate by test year

first-time MOT pass rate in each calendar year both bikes were tested

Test year	Hyosung GV250	Yamaha WR250F
2016	75.0%	78.9%
2017	88.3%	80.3%
2018	77.8%	79.2%
2019	73.7%	77.2%
2020	76.5%	82.5%
2021	77.0%	80.4%
2022	78.4%	76.2%
2023	78.7%	82.1%

Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.

Pass rate by mileage

first-time MOT pass rate by miles on the clock at test

Mileage	Hyosung GV250	Yamaha WR250F
0k-10k miles	81.9%	78.1%
10k-20k miles	76.6%	77.3%
20k-30k miles	74.5%	67.9%

Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.

Hyosung GV250 vs Yamaha WR250F FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Which is more reliable, the Hyosung GV250 or the Yamaha WR250F?

The Hyosung GV250 passes its MOT first time more often than the Yamaha WR250F: 78.3% vs 78.0%, a 0.3-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class, the Hyosung GV250 still comes out ahead: -8.2 points vs comparable bikes for the Hyosung GV250, -10.7 for the Yamaha WR250F. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.

What does the Hyosung GV250 fail its MOT on most?

Lights & signalling: 6.9% of Hyosung GV250 MOT tests failed on it, then brakes (4.2%).

What does the Yamaha WR250F fail its MOT on most?

Lights & signalling: 8.2% of Yamaha WR250F MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (5.1%).

Which holds up better at high mileage, the Hyosung GV250 or the Yamaha WR250F?

At 20k-30k miles the Hyosung GV250 passes first time more often: 74.5% for the Hyosung GV250 vs 67.9% for the Yamaha WR250F.

HYOSUNG GV250 78.3% pass · 1,404 tests YAMAHA WR250F 78.0% pass · 10.5k tests

See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.